 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
09-12-2003, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
common pricing
Posted By: warshawlaw
is that just because some dealer says the card is ultra-high-grade doesn't mean that the grading wonks will agree. I mean, I generally grade cards consistently with SGC, but I can't guarantee that a "really nice" card will pass muster. The "premium" commons I saw over the weekend ranged from ex-mt to mn-mt+. There were no cards I'd consider a "9" and certainly no "10" cards in there, yet many were priced at 4x and 5x "book". 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Its the Common sets that are too common | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-12-2006 03:57 PM |
| G-VG t206 Common for G-VG t205 common | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 02-20-2006 07:44 AM |
| Pricing help | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-29-2005 08:03 PM |
| pricing help | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-11-2005 09:11 PM |
| Pricing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-08-2004 12:39 PM |
Threaded Mode