![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: TBob
You took the words right out of my mouth as I was getting ready to post an identical post based on the Sporting Life Tinker I received in the mail Friday. Great front but only a front scan. The brief language in the ad made me feel comfortable that the back was fine. Instead, there was a number in ink in the top margin on the back. I am old enough to know that I should have asked about the back but you fall in to a false sense of security sometimes when you see a card reasonably priced that you really want and there is no caveat about the back. I emailed the seller, isellmore4u@yahoo.com, and advised him of the problem but have not heard anything yet. I politely stated that I am sure he accidentally missed this and would he consider a discount as I'd like to keep the card. I have had similiar problems with small amount of back damage where only a front scan is shown from other sellers, some power sellers who should know better. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which scanner is the best for scanning cards?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 01-05-2009 05:10 AM |
OT Question About Scanning Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-21-2007 09:00 PM |
Scanning problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2006 06:53 AM |
scanning question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 04-22-2005 11:31 PM |
scanning graded cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 01-23-2005 09:47 PM |