 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
06-28-2003, 10:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
unaltered but fake
Posted By: MW
If this guy has been collecting since 1964 then he also knows that a LEGITIMATELY unaltered N172 with corners like that would sell for much more if it were professionally graded. The only reasons I can think of for not getting the card graded would be that trimmed right edge or problems with authenticity. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Looks fake to me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-26-2008 08:34 AM |
| Fake or not? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 12-21-2005 03:03 PM |
| Look fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-17-2005 07:37 PM |
| What a deal! Fake Ramly and fake signature to boot! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-13-2005 11:16 AM |
| Unaltered?? Corners look clipped to me. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-24-2003 09:50 AM |
Threaded Mode