 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15
01-03-2003, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
An experiment with PRO
Posted By: T206Monsta
...but if you have one company that does 10 times the volume, your going to have a greater case for inconsistency and differentiation in ability regardles of T, N, or E cards because more people are involved that have differing skills. If you started your own business, you might think you do a great job until every one is on to your great job and you have to start hiring people that aren't as good as you and then you have breakdown. You can't discount volume, It directly affects quality. I can't imagine SGC does 1/6 the volume that PSA does in any year but some specialty areas probably do vary. I don't see many 2002 Topps SGC graded cards. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My PSA Experiment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 59 | 05-01-2008 06:17 PM |
| PRO Grading... you've seen the 9's and 10's -- PRO .5 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-07-2007 05:58 AM |
| My experiment on the BST | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 03-03-2007 04:24 PM |
| Grading Co. Experiment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 07-13-2005 11:34 AM |
| My $1,000 Experiment: How to Spend? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 06-16-2005 07:10 PM |
Threaded Mode