![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bob
I am going to withhold judgment on Leland's until I receive my cards. I agree with what Pete told me, that for a large auction house they sure used a small and fuzzy scan of an E98 Cobb and E95 Plank while showing the graded E95 Wagner at about double or three times the size. Maybe that should have been a red flag, but I have been after an EX or better Cobb for a long time and I'll live with a little paper loss on the verso for a reasonable price. I compared the borders (what I could tell) on the E98 Cobb to the E98 Cobb in Mastro (graded G/VG) and the borders were very similar, so I'll keep my fingers crossed. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
winner of the leland matchbook lot #172 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-05-2008 06:36 AM |
LELAND RESULTS - how'd everyone do? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 12-21-2006 12:02 PM |
Jackson 90-1 SGC 5.5 in last night's Leland auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 12-18-2006 05:20 PM |
My favorite Leland lot | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-17-2006 04:03 PM |
Private auctions question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-09-2002 11:40 PM |