![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: runscott
The recent SGC/Dell thing got me to wondering what others consider a card to be. Here are my thoughts on items that could be considered cards, but barely. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David
To me, something is a trading card if it resembles a trading card (whether issued as singles, or cut/detached by the collector) AND the issuer specifically intended them to be collected or otherwise used as trading cards. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
postcard with a HOFer on it! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
This question opens up one of the hobby's can of worms. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Julie Vognar
(but then, he didn't know that I'd be able to afford it. If I didn't buy anything else.) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jay Miller
Julie--I wasn't talking about Lew's card; I was just talking in general. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Moreland
How about this. I think that the "card" has to have either a blank back or some sort of related material on the back. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: David
For the gray areas, where there are many, it is up to how the items were distrubuted. In my opinion, a schedule card can (didn't say always will) be a trading card. Several common 1880s comic trade cards have both the typical advertising on front and league schedules on the back. As these were mass marketed to the general public and were intended to be put in scrapbooks or otherwise collected, they are definitely (in my opinion) trading cards. In fact schedules can be considered a type of advertising ... I don't kmow how the 1886 Red Stocks were distributed-- whether they were distributed to the general public or were meant to be given only to big whigs. As they have tobacco advertising on them, I would lean towards calling them cards .... With the 1863 'Match at Hoboken' pass, it is debatable whether or not it is a card. If only one was made and was given to a VIP, I don't think it qualifies as a trading card. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Mathewson
Hi. This is Roy of LibertyForAll and MediumRareCollectibles and other Square-Meal-Trader names. I agree with Scott, with a few additions: |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TAKING OFFERS -- 1 T card, 1 E card 1 Notebook card 1 Diamond Star plus extra!! | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 12-11-2008 10:09 AM |
For sale 1932 Zeenut Hollywood Vitt, Manager Card cool card | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-24-2008 11:44 AM |
1886 Hancock's Clothing card....1st minor league card | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 4 | 07-25-2008 11:46 PM |
Re: Can An Off-Register Card or A Card With a Slight Printer's Flaw Be Considered NrMint? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 10-27-2007 09:43 AM |
Ruth-Gehrig card, near mint, in Gary Engel's Japanese card auction. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-28-2002 06:33 PM |