![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd (nolemmings)
I think I like Grade Tech's idea of showing magnified corners, which I believe are shown at 20x scale. Corners are my personal gauge of preference on eye appeal, much more than edges, surface and even centering (within reason). My question is, what magnification do you folks generally use when examining cards? I thought PSA and SGC used 10x or 12x, and Brian Daniels sold me a 12x-15x loupe that works very well. My thinking is, if there is some standard magnifcation used different than 20%, shouldn't that be the one used by Grade Tech or any other company that dares to stand behind its assesment of corners? Any corner will look fuzzy at high magnification- why not stick to that which most people "in the know" use? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: petecld
Todd, |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Moreland
"Power" is meaningless in this case, because you are seeing it blown up on a screen, which can have different resolutions, and you are sitting some random distance from the screen. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd (nolemmings)
I too am interested in the cost efficeincy of their enterprise, but back to my original question. Pete, I do trust my eyes first and foremost as to corners, graders be damned. But if I am looking at a scan, I might use more information from magnification to judge the corners. Believe it or not, I believe I am very familiar with what a NM corner would look like under 12x magnification, as I try and focus my collection on nm grades in pre-war, and nm-mt thereafter, so that's the vast bulk of what I see. Even after I buy cards I look at them under the loupe and assign each corner a grade, even if slabbed (although its tougher to examine slabbed cards). If I saw a magnification on a scan, wouldn't or at least couldn't that be helpful? I also have a feel for how SGC and PSA evaluate corners, and what a Nm or nm-mt corner usually looks like in their holders. If I saw a scan of magnified corners in my accustomed 12x power, is there a downside to my using that information? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Mathewson
...when people criticize someone or something, just to be critical or jsut to argue. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dan Mathewson
...I cannot see how the information can be a "gimmick" if this is exactly the information and view that all existing graders use (magnification) to examine and grade a card's corners... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Moreland
I think the corner scans require interpretation, and they may not tell the whole story. A 20x scan isn't going to help with certainty on anything less than NM/MT, because other grades might have corner problems that are outside that tiny area. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Moreland
I criticize the absence of scale. A significant problem with grading standards is that there is no standard way to express scale when discussing corner wear. One man's "touch" is another man's "rounding". |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Grade Tech Services, Inc.
Thank you for initiating this discussion, Todd. It’s been quite interesting and there have been many good questions raised. Let me start by addressing… |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: petecld
Dan, |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...about relative magnification in his post. At 20 power, all cards without "ceramic tile type corners and edges" (which rules out 99.999999999% of all pre-1980's cards) cease to be identifiable at grades other than 9 or 10. Cards graded 6 to 8 will have "powder puff" appearing corners and 1 to 5's will look like an indistinguishable snow drift. While magnification on the order of 20-250 power is an excellent analytical tool for identifing alteration, actually being able to focus in on and study the paper fibres themselves, keep in mind that under enough magnification, even the finest quality razor blade cutting edges, honed to exacting tolerances, appear like a craggy mountain range. Inclusion of 10 power corner images should have been sufficient, and far more indicative of the tools used by most grading services, which have become the industry normalcies, and more sensible. Eye appeal and comparative grading take place at normal focal lengths. This is a "naked eye" hobby. 10 power tools are used to analyze, not necessarily needed for mandatory use in order to enjoy this hobby. This isn't astronomy and it isn't micro-photography. Ten power is MORE than enough, anything more used for the grading itself, is unnecessary over-kill, or a gimmick as I'm sure PSA, SGC, BGS, etc. have all come to the shared conclusion of in using 10power for grading. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...whomever was weilding the equipment to do the card grading, STILL wasn't aware that the T206 "card" the were assessing was a REPRINT. So much for the benefits of 20 power mag. grading (SHEESH!!!). |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
But everyone on this thread except possibly Pete knows nothing about magnification: Koos' post as usual,sounds like it is stating something but what he does not know about magnification is that there are a few different types and if you do not use a loupe corrected for specific types of curvature when you observe specifically the edges of cards you will miss much......regardless of the degree of magnification. (((( I wrote a letter explaining this to a bunch of guys on here to whom I sold the "proper" loupes last year ))))) he also does not know that deliberate VISIBLE alterations are sometimes a smoke screen for other variables that can encompass DOCtoring of cards. In other words,a removed,stretched crease and/or pushing of ink and or air brushing can be less noticable if you manipulate cardboard slightly in other areas in order to create a distraction. This commonly occurs PRIOR to a card being sold encapuslated by a grading company..........also,dying and other methods of deliberate aging of cardboard,wood and ink and oil will not be detected by magnification regardless of how powerful the lens is.........as a certified gemologist I was trained in "color". Color has EXACT designations so you can explain via e-mail or on the phone what color (exact) something is!..cardboard,when processed,has EXACT colors e.g.. pms 342 et......hue creates the need for these designations or we would all have to rely on our subjective perception to determine any color outside of the solar spectrum,the true and pure seven colors. I personally can look at and feel a piece of paper or canvas ( I restore paintings ),and can come within a reasonable period of guessing how old it is.Last ramble.......if you have been collecting for more than let's say 25 years,you know little things......e.g. 1976 Topps Dennis Eckersley cards almost always have a small black print spot on the bottom name plate line.Many of us know of specific cards that are almost always off centered ( a 57 Topps Aaron ) or reverse any E-92 Croft's Cocoa for example.....and how many times have vintage collectors seen an E-102 Evers centered 99/1 top to bottom....many ,many times. Calling to suspect a card that does not "feel" right or even "smell" right and is well centered of this issue would surely cause me an extra five minutes of examination before I felt fully confident that the card is worthy of encapsulation....... experienced collectors know what cards from what issues have particular problems like the examples mentioned above........a magnifying lens of intense power will not help you with this type of knowledge.......and yes!!,I did state "smell" the paper..paper smells different depending on age and type of print processing on the raw paper itself....it would be fairly easy to submit cards to you folks that you would surely certify that I have restored. I am not certain as to what kind of equipment you use to review cards but if your close to WAYNE or TOMS RIVER let me know! I'd like to see it.. Point being......you may be attempting to rely way,way too much on magnification when it is only a fraction of detection by way of only one sense,your sight........and with magnification that if not curved properly distorts. Good luck! You need a vintage grader that has a little more than card shop owner experience! : ) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DaveP
i've read this thread twice now. so far i agree with mr. matthewson because all you seem to be doing is being critical to the grading company for providing more information about a graded card rather than less information, like other graders. your position doesn't make sense to me either. i'm not defending the grader because i don't employ grading services but sometimes i buy cards that have been graded already. what grade tech is doing seems very customer-centered to me. as a buyer i would like as much info as possible and i can simply ignore any info that isn't important to me personally. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...if you're going to offer as part of your service, something unlike anyother grading service, something totally state of the art (TWENTY-power grading), since THAT aspect is fully incorporated into the process and determination of grade as an integral part, you need technicians as fully versed in the mechanical techniques and subtleties of magnification and interpretation as in art of card grading itself and identification of reprints, knock-offs, and FULL knowledge of all restoration applications. Unless you're dealing with a multi-million dollar, fully computer automated, scanning magnification, optical system where 99.99% of all idiosynchroses of magnification are adjusted/eliminated automatically, not being familiar with the types of distortion that can exist with different optics can give false reads. In other words, the more "Buck Rogers" you design your technical operations, the more you need Buck Rogers!!! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: B C Daniels
you do not need MAGNIFICATION at all to detect triming........the primary subject and concers of your posts at least on this thread! ...... you way,way overate the use of one and do not seem to acknowledge that triming is the LEASt of alteration concerns for a grading service! or should be..........to easy to alter in other ways with minimal or no detection...THAT was the point! USE THE OTHER SENSES AS A LEARNING TOOL in discovering how people manipulate paper and get off the magnification concerns.... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...that it would both rattle your cage and ruffle your feathers. The one time that you made perfect sense that I am aware of, recognizing that, was all it took!! You didn't diasappoint me in the least. When you have an axe to grind, you're going to try to get the old stone wheel going, one way or another, whether by agreement or disagreement. And so it begins again. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...contains the word M-A-G-N-F-I-C-A-T-I-O-N. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DaveP
it would seem this koos fellow knows quite a bit about trimming, given the other threads i read about his cards he auctions in pro holders. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...already graded by Pro as a result of an Ebay auction in June of 2000. This Koos fellow hasn't offered any BASEBALL cards OTHER than graded on Ebay for almost a year! But then, you already know that and just want to "play" I reckon', in which case I'd be more than happy to ante you in and give you chips. I can see where you would mistake the 52T Pro Mantle for being a trimmed card. Especially that it FILLS the entire holder card area and is OVER-sized if anything. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DaveP
in looking at the earlier posts you were the one saying bad things abour that pro grading company and your cards in their holders, then trying to auction those same cards later for a lot of money. you even said that everything in one of their holders must be assumed to be restored somehow. i was only going on your own words, sir. it looked like you knew you were selling cut cards and not wanting to have a more reputable grader look at them because they would expose them as cut. maybe that's not the right interpretation but that's just how it looked from all the postings. sorry if that was not the whole story. since pro graders have such a bad rap, is there a reason why you just don't have someone else grade them? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...of the "Flying Dutchman" (not Honus Wagner, the Ghost-ship.."Der Flegende Hollander")and circumnavigating the Board for another 3 to 4 weeks dancing the Limbo of the Lost on this subject, please just read all the posts on Pro grading, Dr.Koos, and associated ill-will posted on this Board over the last 10 pages or so. I think you missed alot between the opening coin toss and the ripping down of the goal posts. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DaveP
that's why i wondered why you don't just have a reputable grader grade your cards and the controversy would be over. you even admitted many times that pro is a bad grader, why not have beckett or psa or one of those graders grade them? (i assume they can be graded by someone else, even though pro graders already graded them once, right?) for cards worth thousands of dollars, it seems a good investment. it only costs $10-$15 to grade a card, doesn't it? or is it more than that? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
as everybody elses! |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...How many times have you said on this Board, "I don't sell cards". Yeah...That's a horse-laugh. Sure YOU don't. You send them to OTHERS to sell for you replete with instuctions on what to describe, what to bust out of graded holders, etc.. What was that B., why do you buy so many SGC 80 T206s? Anyone remember all the E cards I auctioned last year??? Anyone have any idea just where I got those? I've still got scans of the inventory list in Daniels' restorer's hands. Anyone care to see the 1000 or so emails I'VE SAVED from this ultimate hippocrit and noted misanthropic pipsqueak with two broken wings, who can't even lift up a baby without squealing in pain, that threatens to "Choke people out" like some poor man's Marco Ruas. I've got dozens of emails from this General Tom Thumb showing before and after scans and descriptions of what was done to cards, right out of the BRIAN DANIELS RESTORATION LABORATORY, he owns that NOW reside in PSA holders and other's collections. Anyone doubt me???? "Help me out PLEASE, Marla's (the missus) out of a job, the baby's on the way, and I have to move some stuff". I helped this pathetic loser and I'm sorry I did. Now, he's kicking and screaming about 2 cards that I haven't had the chance to send back from the last load he sent me which I sold/auctioned for him (so he can keep up the pretext that he DOESN'T sell, only buys...what bologna!) FREE of charge without commission. What a piece of work! Meanwhile, he supposedly has $500,000 worth of cards, mostly restored by him, sitting in Doug Allen's house and he says "Doug won't return them". The only thing you can believe out of this total charlatan's mouth is that you don't know WHAT to believe. I DO, since I have his 1000 or so emails verifying everything said here AND FAR FAR MORE. Let's keep going. I LIKE THIS!!!! Let me get out the old BCD floppy disc file box!!!! This is going to be FUN!!!! And the funniest thing is that when this pissant wants ALL my personal information, for what purpose I can't even begin to fathom, and I don't provide it for him..he doesn't like it. As if I should draw a roadmap for every reprobate and deviate that wants to find me. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
Email: received by comickeys (me) from mdaniels1@earthlink.net (Brain Daniels). |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: vorthian
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
you don't show up when someone flies 3000 miles to see you because your ashamed of yourself |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
Forwarded from Marla Daniels (Brian Daniels) to Me: |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...and I'm sure that anyone that knows you is aware of your eccentric propensity for exaggeration and outright tale-spinning. I can't leave here yet, there's still alot of emails to post from you divulging which cards you restored and sold elsewhere. I'm rustling them all up now, so you keep bandying about while I keep correlating. There's going to be ALOT of busy busy people going through cards that passed through your hands that are going to have to be checked. You forget, because of your need to brag and boast, you actually forgot just how much you divulged to me. Earning your trust was easy, like ANY child. I told you what you wanted to hear, and you spilled your guts as if someone ran a bayonet across them. I don't think you realize what you told me about your card dealings. I'll remind you. I'm sure there's MANY collectors that are going to want to hear this MAJOR hobby restoration shakeup. As you once said, "between you and Daniel Desmond (whoever he is?) you wouldn't be surprised if at least 75% of all high grade Vintage cards are DONE", lots of them sitting in PSA holders. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Dniels
should I post that letter! nah! I don't need to do that.Your own posts about things these guys despise would elude to that.No need. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
From Brian Daniels: |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
right??? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..EMAILS to me about who you pushed restored cards through, exactly like the one above, we'll see who's asked to leave. What are you going to do when Doug reads the above post from your own mouth, and Bill Mastro reads it and BOTH KNOW EXACTLY WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, then ask themselves, "CHRIST, how did KOOS KNOW?????!!!!!". When we're done, we'll see who the liar is. This is going to be the weeks of hobby revelation for ANYONE you ever came into contact with. Oh, and I was ALREADY A GOLD-POWER-SELLER BEFORE you ever asked me to sell cards for you so you could keep up the charade of ONLY BEING A BUYER. The real problem here is that I CAN PROVE WHAT I'M SAYING because evryone will know I'm spouting facts that only YOU and THEY should have known, braggart with no brain. Why do you think I saved EVERY ONE of your emails. I knew you would one day self-destruct and I wanted a record of my NON-INVOLVEMENT. Stupidly, you were willing to run your infamous mouth and I was MORE than willing to listen. Funny how I NEVER LET YOU RESTORE NOT EVEN ONE PIECE FOR ME, even though you offered to MANY times, suggesting I buy this and that and that you can turn it into a 7 or 8 and I pay you a flat rate. I'll be finding those emails too along with those implicating many others in your restoration and grading shenanigans. And you're right, if Doug KNEW what you were giving him to submit because you were using him for his "pull" with PSA (as you put it), he would have smashed you across your face with it. Choke out this guy and that guy, you couldn't even choke out your chicken. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: BcD
to my inquiry as to where you have seen more than exactly ONE reprint of the famed E-95 Cobb card ??? You ad states you have seen several on e-bay! being as you are Mr. Pizza delivery cut and paste.........and love to challenge people on the facts.......WHERE IS THE OTHER ADS YOU WOULD HAVE SAVED OF THE ALLEGED,OTHER E-95 COBBS YOU HAVE SEEN ON E-BAY???? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...loss for words on them? Can't think fast enough? You're reeling? All you keep doing is throwing MORE red Herrings at me but you're not commenting on or stopping the flow here. You've got a BIG BIG problem. Here and NOW, and it's NOT going away. I haven't even BEGUN to post your numerous, braggidocio emails about your restoration and where the cards went, and who graded them, and who owns them now. I'd seriously be focusing on some kind of damage control RIGHT NOW (you know what Apollo Creed's manager kept saying to Rocky, "There IS no tomorrow") instead of this farce of a defense, even though damage control, at this point is useless. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: B C Daniels
that should be DOCTOR Daniels to you |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
From BCD: |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: B C Daniels
drug deals???? hello! I told you my brother died of an overdose and you think this is ther kind of thing Zi weanted to hear.........or stip club central??/ |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: B C D
real collectors of cards do not need a magnifying glass to detect alterations.........it's just the onlt .05% part of card collecting you know a tiny bit of........sorry I helped you,tried to trust you and most of all had any concern for you.... |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
When we're done, week's from now with this restoration Hobby shakeup, EVERYONE you involved and sold to/traded with, submitted for you will have read my "doctored" emails and said, "O my GOD!! Koos is telling the truth, he's reciting word for word and describing the event exactly as transpired!". |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...you don't realize the severity of the problem you have?? You're FINISHED in this hobby and you can't even think of flubbing a decent excuse to explain any of the few emails I've divulged out of a THOUSAND. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
...are you crazy altogether. I TOLD you this? You have an email with my words saying this? I have emails with everything you said and I am repeating here verbatem containing the HEADERS, those funny encryptiques at the bottom with the original text interjected between them that CAN'T BE ALTERED, even if you tried!!!! When all the pertanent emails to your massive, widespread hobby fraud are posted, anyone wishing a copy of a particular email can request it if they would like additional proof to pursue recompensation. I must say from your recent posts...you're TERRIBLE under pressure! The things you choose to focus on while your tenure in this hobby slowly draws to a well-deserved conclusion, astound me. I'm as in awe of your lack of common sense as the cavernous size of your mouth the past 2 years. I'm relaxing tomorrow and then starting on Monday, I'm taking the week off to concentrate on posting all pertanent posts. The members were right. NOW, all my powers will be concentrated on GOOD in ridding, eradicating, and revealing fully a specific pestilence in this hobby that they ALL suspected existed anyway... at least you'll have 24 hours to fumble SOME kind of decent offensive/defensive strategy other than I'm "making it up" and I "do drugs"!!! I'm confident that most here recognize the truth and have ample brainpower to discern who here dwells on the Lunatic fringe. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..posts? Oh, you're probably already answering all the emails that are starting to pour in. Better learn to type with your toes too or hire a scribe! |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
but first: |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..what is forthcoming is more important to this hobby than any other thread in the history of this Board. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dr.Koos
..when they realize that you played them like an old banjo!! |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: B C Daniels
gone bad thing! the only thing was a " Did I say that? " and the obvious answer is yes! Are you denying it......... |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: It's only 12.30 am here!
drugs will keep ypu up but not I ......I am going to sleep.........you can stay up and dream up a bunch of e-mails and excuses for not validating your a doctor or have law suits peniding concerning your bogus cards and David's bid withdrawals on the mantle......your power seller "on the phone" right now was unsuccessful in suspending him which you staed would occur but then again......it's more hot air from a drug dealer trying to launder money through cards and comics and also attempt to avoid ala"money" and greater child support........enjoy...yawn! |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: DaveP
all i wanted to know is why koos refuses to send those two cards in pro holders to a reputable grader, rather than argue with everyone about them. if they are really ok and not trimmed, why not send them to sgc or psa and have them graded and put into reputable holders? |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT: At least 22 Dead at Virginia Tech | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 248 | 04-24-2007 02:03 PM |
VBC low-tech snipe service. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-22-2007 05:27 PM |
grade with cut corner on Rudolph, Toronto? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-09-2004 03:28 PM |
Grade Tech - WOW! More and more, I really like this company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 08-23-2002 02:23 PM |
"Grade Tech" let off too easy~ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 08-18-2002 12:51 AM |