![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
The card wasn't downgraded for the overstamp I assure you. It should have been a 40 but I was just glad to have it in a holder, with the designated overstamp. There is a heavy crease you can not see on the front.....again, they did NOT take off for the overstamp.....and it should have been a 40 but why argue over it? They did good on the rest of the cards...although are definitely tight on the grades....SGC still rules in my book....best regards |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
e94 Devore violet, Davis red to trade for e94 murrays | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-19-2008 04:10 PM |
up on ebay: e94 speaker, e94 lajoie, t206 johnson | Archive | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 04-09-2008 10:12 PM |
e94 Lajoie (gold) & e94 Mcgraw (purple) FOR TRADE | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 10 | 08-25-2006 12:25 AM |
E94 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-02-2005 07:03 PM |
E94 overprint | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 06-05-2003 10:08 PM |