 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
01-26-2002, 11:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Old vs. New Condition Standards
Posted By: jay behrens
I define a crease as a flaw in the card that breaks the original surface of the card causing loss of coloration and noticable defect. Something that doesn't break the surface I would call a wrinkle, I wouldn't grade anything with a wrinkle higher than EX, and personally would be preferable to a crease since it would leave the original picture in tact which is the most important thing for me. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T207 Grading Standards VS. Other Tobacco Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-26-2007 02:57 PM |
| Shipping standards on B/S/T | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-06-2006 08:45 PM |
| What's wrong with photo cards grading standards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-29-2005 09:16 PM |
| ebay standards for listings | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-25-2004 10:57 AM |
| Steve Verkman grading standards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-01-2002 01:36 PM |
Threaded Mode