NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-21-2025, 10:04 AM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,395
Default

Thanks Brian. While I have I have the Campos black star, a partial black star and a partial missing front border, I would view them as scarce print defects. But the hobby has long classified the black star as a variation and it is included in most master checklists for the 52 set
Attached Images
File Type: jpg img089 (1).jpg (97.1 KB, 244 views)
File Type: jpg dd58f253-b85c-49a6-9bc4-5afa46e82b59_zps79d0bc28.jpg (60.0 KB, 243 views)
File Type: jpg img557_zps77b20073.jpg (70.1 KB, 238 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-21-2025, 11:17 AM
rich699 rich699 is offline
member
 
Join Date: Dec 2024
Posts: 12
Default Dennis Higgins #441 W/L

PM
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_4031.jpg (187.2 KB, 244 views)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-21-2025, 11:43 AM
Zach Wheat Zach Wheat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Thanks Brian. While I have I have the Campos black star, a partial black star and a partial missing front border, I would view them as scarce print defects. But the hobby has long classified the black star as a variation and it is included in most master checklists for the 52 set
Agree that however the variations occurred, the hobby accepts them as legit variations for the master set collectors
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2025, 12:40 PM
raineybt's Avatar
raineybt raineybt is offline
Brian Rainey
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2024
Location: Rockville Centre, NY
Posts: 33
Default

I find myself constantly torn from a hobby standpoint on what's a "true" variation and what's a print defect. The 1960 Faye Throneberry "Yankees variation" is to be my litmus test of sorts. These were clearly created due to proof sheets that were caught and fixed before the full print run was put to press and issued. This card therefore becomes an interesting proof card, but becomes part of the collection related to other ephemera of interest, not part of an official set (or more importantly for someone that collects for completeness, not something I'm missing to close out a set).

How I've decided to generally put a card on the side of VAR vs. printing defects is what the grading companies will classify. Its very ironic given that I'm by and large anti-grading (too subjective, wild conflicts of interest, cost, speed - I can go on), but I also recognize that's where the hobby has gone. The PGCs recognizing and slabbing a variant makes it to me "part of the set", where they generally put "Authentic" for samples, proofs, etc (or won't grade them at all).

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
Thanks Brian. While I have I have the Campos black star, a partial black star and a partial missing front border, I would view them as scarce print defects. But the hobby has long classified the black star as a variation and it is included in most master checklists for the 52 set
__________________
Making my way slowly to trying to pull together as much of a Washington Senators collection as I can, one card at a time.

Always looking to trade for anything I don't have yet!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2025, 03:56 PM
ALR-bishop ALR-bishop is offline
Al Richter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 9,395
Default

The grading companies used to follow what the SCD Standard Catalog and or Becketts did in terms of variations but that obviously does not happen anymore.

Topps proofs tend to be blank bank, but the 60 Throneberry, as well as the Hadley and Cimoli have finished backs. Still I agree with you about not including it on master lists

From Bob Lemke's blog blog

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awri...HRoRUgHyqk.mU-

From Dave Hornish's great blog and article by Olberman
But if Olberman is right they would meet the definition of a variation held by some.. card changed by the manufacturer after printing started


https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrF...ciWJ1.Ww_SlUA-

Last edited by ALR-bishop; 03-21-2025 at 04:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-24-2025, 10:43 AM
Elberson's Avatar
Elberson Elberson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: CHARLOTTE NC
Posts: 716
Default

Ok….the rabbit hole I will go than…..

2 down……
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2555.jpg (188.6 KB, 203 views)
File Type: jpg IMG_2556.jpg (191.4 KB, 201 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2025, 06:59 AM
toppcat's Avatar
toppcat toppcat is online now
Dave.Horn.ish
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,935
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALR-bishop View Post
The grading companies used to follow what the SCD Standard Catalog and or Becketts did in terms of variations but that obviously does not happen anymore.

Topps proofs tend to be blank bank, but the 60 Throneberry, as well as the Hadley and Cimoli have finished backs. Still I agree with you about not including it on master lists

From Bob Lemke's blog blog

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=Awri...HRoRUgHyqk.mU-

From Dave Hornish's great blog and article by Olberman
But if Olberman is right they would meet the definition of a variation held by some.. card changed by the manufacturer after printing started


https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrF...ciWJ1.Ww_SlUA-
I feel like these three are the first chase cards in a way.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-30-2025, 03:21 PM
Elberson's Avatar
Elberson Elberson is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: CHARLOTTE NC
Posts: 716
Default

1 more down……12 to go
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_2617.jpg (184.7 KB, 83 views)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-01-2025, 02:50 PM
butchie_t butchie_t is offline
β∪τ∁ℏ †∪RΩεΓ
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,421
Default

Mr Moeller is in very nice shape.

I just looked at Mantle WL's on eBay. I'll never again question my decision to buy the one I did, when I did.

At today's prices, I would NEVER be able to buy one.

__________________
“Man proposes and God disposes.”
U.S. Grant, July 1, 1885

Completed: 1969 - 2000 Topps Baseball Sets and Traded Sets.

Senators and Frank Howard fan.

I collect Topps baseball variations -- I can quit anytime I want to.....I DON'T WANT TO.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-01-2025, 03:42 PM
JollyElm's Avatar
JollyElm JollyElm is offline
D@rrΣn Hu.ghΣs
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cardboard Land
Posts: 8,154
Default

Knowing that Mantles will always keep going up and up in value, I was happy to land this one when I did a long while back.
Just the tiniest bit of the black going out of bounds on back...

1969MantleWL500frontback.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land

https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm

Looking to trade? Here's my bucket:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706

“I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.”
Casey Stengel

Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s.

Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: 1969 Topps Mantle White Letters PSA 5 SOLD lug-nut 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 4 01-16-2021 07:11 PM
WTB 1969 Topps #567 Pirates White Letters ejstel 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 0 12-18-2020 11:35 PM
WTB 1969 Topps White Letters robsbessette 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 4 11-08-2020 02:41 PM
FS/ 1969 Topps Mantle White Letters 9(OC), the only one! CMIZ5290 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 18 03-01-2018 01:40 PM
1969 Topps Baseball White Letters batsballsbases 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 5 01-26-2014 08:01 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:57 PM.


ebay GSB