![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As a lawyer, I stand by mine 100%. There is no court that will find a post of a card for sale with a price and how payment is accepted, that doesn't express an intent to be bound to the first to accept the offer, constitutes a binding offer on the part of the seller. I provided you the most significant cases on the issue, including those that support the proposition that an invitation to treat can become an offer under the right circumstances. And none of them support your claim. Like I said, provide a case that provides otherwise. Those cases are very fact specific. And these aren't those facts.
Last edited by OhioLawyerF5; 02-25-2025 at 11:11 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BST etiquette | Flintboy | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 01-01-2023 06:47 PM |
B/S/T etiquette question | pokerplyr80 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 05-16-2016 09:33 PM |
Ebay etiquette | celoknob | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-19-2010 10:15 PM |
Question about B/S/T etiquette | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 05-23-2008 11:53 AM |
forum etiquette | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-23-2004 09:35 AM |