|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-09-2025 at 11:01 PM. Reason: Correction |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it might be Bill McCool under McAuliffe but if it is then that creates a problem with Ellsworth to the left of McCool because Ellsworth isn't under Klippstein, so unless this involves a row change then one or the other can't be right.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
This was sitting in plain sight for so long earlier on this thread - Phillies team under Hargan. The only cards it could be (gray color, not in another row already) were Hargan, Banks and Linz. The thickness variations in the visible border make it a cinch for Hargan. This creates another 5 card partial column - Hargan, Phillies, Buchek, Wynn and Ferrara.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was going to argue again about why Hatton was over the A's team instead of the Phillies - even though Phillies is under Hargan, could be under Hatton on the other slit - but since Hatton is now confirmed next to Wyatt, this places him in a 3 card partial column and since Phillies team is in a 5 card partial, well that's that. Hatton over the A's team.
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I've long wondered why it can't be Rollins to the right of Ellsworth in the diamond miscut - the grass color is much darker than Ellsworth's in both cases, and trying to be precise on color tone with that poor image is dicey. I'm not saying it IS Rollins, just asking why it couldn't be. For you does it come down to the darker green on McCool?
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-05-2025 at 07:41 PM. Reason: Grammar |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can't believe it but we actually have a 1966 6th Series cluster going.
???????? - ?????? - Cannizzaro - ?????? ***l*******l********l********l*** ???????? - ?????? - *Belinsky* - ?????? ***l*******l********l********l*** *Howard - Hatton - **Wyatt** - ?????? ***l*******l********l********l*** *Oliva* - A's Team - *Blefary* - ?????? ***l*******l*********l********l*** Simmons - Radatz - Klippstein - McAuliffe ***l*******l********l********l*** Ellsworth - Rollins - ????????? - McCool
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-05-2025 at 08:15 PM. Reason: Updated |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
I show it could be Covington, Stanky, Wilhelm or John in the Hargan column - do you prefer Covington due to card counts?
On McCool under McAuliffe - why McCool? We have McAuliffe in a column of 1 right now - the only blue cards it couldn't be are those in columns 1 and 10 and those in the Klippstein and Radatz columns to his left - together these are Nuxhall, Rollins, Klippstein and Edwards. Could still be McCool, Coleman or Oliva, no? Can you re-post the card count list you're using for reference? I did one way back on the first page of this thread. Last edited by deweyinthehall; 02-05-2025 at 08:20 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here's an update of the cluster:
Richardson - Johnson - *Hargan* - ??????? - ????????? - Yankees Rookies ***l**********l*********l********l********l******* ****l*** *Rodgers* - Jimenez - Phillies Tm - ?????? - Cannizzaro - **Bressoud** ***l*********l********l********l********l********* ***l** **Lolich* - O'Donoghue- Buchek - ?????? - *Belinsky* - ?????????? ***l*********l********l********l********l********* ***l*** *Bunker* - ????????? - *Howard* - Hatton - **Wyatt** - ???????? ***l*********l********l********l*********l******** ***l*** *Bob Lee* - ??????? - **Oliva** - A's Team - *Blefary* - ???????? ***l*********l*********l********l*********l******* ***l**** *Wynn* - ????????? - **Simmons - Radatz - Klippstein - **McAuliffe ***l*********l********l********l********l********* **l**** Ferrara - **Bennett - *Ellsworth - *Rollins - ????????? - **McCool*
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-06-2025 at 12:16 AM. Reason: Updated |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 05:25 PM |
| FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 10:55 PM |
| FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 09:13 PM |
| 1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 08:42 AM |
| 1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 02:09 PM |