Let�s rehash the Bond Bread controversy.

butchie_t · #11 12-15-2024, 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnphotoman

Quote from Post #412 -from butchie t: �Here is my Jackie Robinson, front and back for comparison. I purchased this along with the other 23 way back in May of 1990 from the Baseball Card Society. What I know up to now, it is part of the Festberg find.�

This question is for butchie t: how did you come to believe your cards are from the Festberg find? I will have more questions in upcoming posts for you butchie t. John

John,

My answer to you on the 'why I believed' is based on:
1. Ignorance
2. Not enough information coming into that thread back then.
3. The letter I received when I was a member of the Baseball Card Society. Assumption my my part connecting Festberg to my card set.

Excerpt here (Page 2 of what I called the Feldstein Letter(he wrote it.):

"All the baseball cards they produced that weren't put in bread
packages were stored in a dusty warehouse and, quite literally,
forgotten about when they went out of business. Many years later a
famous collector discovered the cards in the warehouse and snapped up
all of them. He died a few months ago and his widow offered us the
card sets that remained. "

///Question: Has there ever been a determination of who this famous collector is? (Since it was possibly not Festburg?)///

In my quest to find out more about this set I bought back in 1990, I searched and came across this website... And the famous or infamous thread on the Bond Card questions. Based on what I read and my ignorance, I applied the find to the Festburg Find.

I joined the site at that time and made my initial posts of what I had purchased.

I could not tie the color of back of my cards to anything substantial, so, I figured Festburg was the logical fit at the time, based solely on the thread.

While I may have changed my opinion since then, I'm still not exactly sure the origin of what I have. That is just me either hoping or injected doubt from additional information that has been discussed after that thread was basically closed.

One thing I have outstanding questions I have not seen discussed is card stock used and the thickness of a card stock from a bond Bread card verses a Sports Star Subject set, verses a Festberg find card.

My thoughts on this:

1. All three card stock thicknesses are different.
2. Bond and Sports card stock measure the same thickness
3. Sports card stock and the Festberg card stock are the same thickness.

There is probably another option here but I would believe that card stock and the thickness of that card stock can be a data point to rule in or out certain items.

And from all the above, my own selfish reason that I want to believe the set I bought can be designated and dated to the 47 era. Thus making my cards worth more. Right now they are a $255.00 oddity. Still ain't selling them though.

Butch Turner

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Bond Bread again.	Johnphotoman	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	6	02-06-2022 09:28 PM
Bond Bread Tin	incugator	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	28	11-29-2021 10:33 AM
Bond Bread or Bond Homogenize Bread	Johnphotoman	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	7	10-24-2021 05:53 PM
SGC and Bond Bread	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	15	03-04-2006 06:32 PM
1947 bond bread	Archive	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	21	06-21-2005 08:27 PM