![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do get both sides on this
1) What I believe is when you pay to get a card graded, unless there is something more which needs to be researched or looked into that is what you should pay. Nothing more nothing less. Getting charged more later is aggravating as a consumer. 2) The other side, as pointed out on a Bill Russell RC, the ppstage/insurance cost to ship the card back to you needs to be adjusted for. If the Russell RC was graded and assumed to have a value of X you paid that to help for the card's safe return If the grade was 1-2 higher than you expected and the postage/insurance to ensure the safe return then you do need to pay more to in actuality protect yourself. I'm sure there is more but that's the simplest way to argue both sides of this equation. If something happens to your card on the return trip and the insurance, etc is adjusted you may have preferred to receive your card but at least you should be made whole So figure out which side of this equation you want to be on and understand both sides of the logic. Rich
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
O/T....Ebay Charges? | Ben Yourg | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-04-2020 12:02 PM |
Cards4HurricanefRelief :: Shipping Charges .. etc.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-19-2005 12:54 PM |
Shipping charges lowered | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 10-04-2004 01:55 PM |
Filing Charges | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-27-2003 11:57 AM |
Shipping charges | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-05-2002 03:18 PM |