Collectors (PSA) Acquired SGC - Net54baseball.com Forums
  NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2024, 08:56 AM
Fred's Avatar
Fred Fred is offline
Fred
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,364
Default

After reading through this thread there seems to be "SGC" and "PSA" collectors. I'm neither. I collect cards that may or may not be encapsulated and if encapsulated, it could be by either (or different) TPG plastic housing the cards.

I'm not going to bust the card out of a piece of plastic because of some BS brand loyalty to a TPG whose subjectivity is just as bad as the other TPG.

In the end, does it really matter? It's a piece of plastic with a paper flip. I can't imagine why the encapsulation is going to influence the pricing that much.

I get it, if it's in a PSA slab it may get a little more money, but do people really think that because it's not in PSA plastic, the card is going to be worth so much less?

The writers of Seinfeld could have had a field day with this topic. I could see Larry David poking a lot of fun at this in Curb Your Enthusiasm.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something
cool you're looking to find a new home for.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-03-2024, 09:12 AM
cdogstu99 cdogstu99 is offline
Chris
Chr!s Stua.rt
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: MA
Posts: 70
Default

PSA To Buy SGC – Should This Card Grading Monopoly Be Allowed?

https://allvintagecards.com/psa-to-buy-sgc-monopoly/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2024, 10:39 AM
cgjackson222's Avatar
cgjackson222 cgjackson222 is offline
Charles Jackson
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cdogstu99 View Post
PSA To Buy SGC – Should This Card Grading Monopoly Be Allowed?

https://allvintagecards.com/psa-to-buy-sgc-monopoly/
I think the purchase of SGC will go completely under the radar of the FCC because "For 2024, the size-of-transaction threshold for reporting proposed mergers and acquisitions under Section 7A of the Clayton Act will adjust from $111.4 million to $119.5 million". I believe the purchase of SGC was/will be slightly less than $119.5

Even if it was above the $119.5 threshold should the FCC apply resources/scrutiny to this completely non-essential service?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2024, 10:47 AM
Peter_Spaeth's Avatar
Peter_Spaeth Peter_Spaeth is online now
Peter Spaeth
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 34,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cgjackson222 View Post
I think the purchase of SGC will go completely under the radar of the FCC because "For 2024, the size-of-transaction threshold for reporting proposed mergers and acquisitions under Section 7A of the Clayton Act will adjust from $111.4 million to $119.5 million". I believe the purchase of SGC was/will be slightly less than $119.5

Even if it was above the $119.5 threshold should the FCC apply resources/scrutiny to this completely non-essential service?
You mean the FTC, not the FCC, but yes it's under reportable thresholds.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby:
No consequences.
Stuff trumps all.
The flip is the commoodity.
Animal Farm grading.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-03-2024, 11:30 AM
cgjackson222's Avatar
cgjackson222 cgjackson222 is offline
Charles Jackson
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,959
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth View Post
You mean the FTC, not the FCC, but yes it's under reportable thresholds.
I mean the Federal Collectables Commission (Ba Dum Tiss, slaps self congratulatory five)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg dum-tss.jpg (10.7 KB, 270 views)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-03-2024, 11:19 AM
ullmandds's Avatar
ullmandds ullmandds is online now
pete ullman
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: saint paul, mn
Posts: 11,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred View Post
After reading through this thread there seems to be "SGC" and "PSA" collectors. I'm neither. I collect cards that may or may not be encapsulated and if encapsulated, it could be by either (or different) TPG plastic housing the cards.

I'm not going to bust the card out of a piece of plastic because of some BS brand loyalty to a TPG whose subjectivity is just as bad as the other TPG.

In the end, does it really matter? It's a piece of plastic with a paper flip. I can't imagine why the encapsulation is going to influence the pricing that much.

I get it, if it's in a PSA slab it may get a little more money, but do people really think that because it's not in PSA plastic, the card is going to be worth so much less?

The writers of Seinfeld could have had a field day with this topic. I could see Larry David poking a lot of fun at this in Curb Your Enthusiasm.

I agree with most of this...EXCEPT that only card nerds would appreciate a curb episode on this topic...not funny for the masses!

I could see a documentary on the comical corruption of the sports card hobby someday on tbs or the history channel.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Acquired CollectingAmericasPastime 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 9 11-16-2021 06:32 AM
Kuhn - Acquired. Thanks! CollectingAmericasPastime 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T 3 09-04-2019 01:34 PM
Cobb Acquired! CollectingAmericasPastime T206 cards B/S/T 1 02-09-2018 08:50 AM
Can u remember ur 1st T206 u acquired? danmckee Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 82 02-10-2012 12:18 PM
WTB: Ray Schalk ACQUIRED jb217676 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 01-10-2011 09:55 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 PM.


ebay GSB