 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
10-02-2023, 10:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
So are 90% of you guys all really going to sit here and continue to pretend that the listing didn't expressly state that you could win the set lot but still end up losing if the individual lots closed higher in aggregate?
In what universe is Powell the rightful winner under the terms set out in the auction itself? Half you guys are lawyers, and you really can't figure out this one simple little paragraph? It's not exactly a riddle. The rules were stupid. We can all agree on that. But they were extremely clear. This shouldn't have surprised anyone. This exact outcome was very predictable. If you wanted to ensure a win, you had to bid on every single lot, including the set. If you weren't sure about that or how it might work, you could have easily picked up the phone and asked.
__________________
If it's not perfectly centered, I probably don't want it. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1912 Boston Garters - Show'em :) | Bryan Long | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-21-2013 04:59 PM |
| Boston Garters Speaker & EVers F/S SOLD SOLD SOLD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 02-01-2008 01:58 PM |
| Heritage Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 10-30-2007 12:57 PM |
| Boston Garters question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-23-2006 07:26 PM |
| D359's and Boston Garters For Sale | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 01-20-2005 08:01 PM |
Threaded Mode