![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the feedback. I guess I was looking at the 1941 Play Balls or the 1948-50 Bowmans, which were much smaller than the "mainstream" sets in the early 1950s, and I figured that over time, whether a card is oversized or undersized relative to the norm isn't going to matter in the eyes of collectors. I wonder if this is a longer term arbitrage...
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F/S - Small Topps Regional Team Sets | Frazier | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 2 | 08-19-2022 05:23 PM |
Prices of complete sets relative to singles | bks14sr | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-16-2022 04:18 PM |
It's all relative | Touch'EmAll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-31-2018 02:36 PM |
Greatest Regional Sets ..... | Neal | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 62 | 07-25-2016 04:10 PM |
1980s small oddball, regional, food sets | Wite3 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 03-23-2013 07:07 PM |