![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lots of folks continue to make valid observations directly in line with the
intent of the original post. Although I don't ask fellow collectors to fill out a questionnaire about their purpose for collecting, I can say for sure I don't know 5 who zero in on registry as their prime mover for collecting. It seems reasonable to suggest that SGC would have implemented a registry (re-implemented?) if they deemed it profitable for their business. The fact that they have not essentially reveals that answer. Lorewalker- I'm "wound too tight"? Glass houses come to mind. You don't know me and never will- thank Heaven. Your approach on this topic was flawed (again) and it doesn't require "anger" to discern. I'm sure your flighty response to the next topic will be an example of flawless logic as well. Trent King |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Registry | Copa7 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-07-2019 10:21 AM |
GAI Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-06-2005 09:12 AM |
Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-19-2005 11:59 AM |
set registry? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-08-2005 07:28 AM |
SGC Set Registry II | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-13-2003 01:27 AM |