![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The person who originally graded it told me he couldn't see any trimming, and had no other evidence of alterations, so he graded it correctly at an 8. No conspiracy, no nothing. Now, after the fact and with other evidence, it's a different story. Trimming will never be an exact science and many are hard to tell, at best. .
As far as it being a 10...just some kind of gamesmanship or joke. Concerning the original DiMaggio card, whomever graded it should have measured it first. Big mistake. The BODA group does a fantastic job. Kudos to them and I hope they keep going forever and a day!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 02-27-2023 at 07:21 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB/Seeking Trade For: T206 Walter Johnson Portrait (SGC Heavily Preferred) | MailboxBaseball | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 07-29-2017 11:13 AM |
WTB: Chopped or Heavily Miscut Dodgers or Dodgers with Crazy Printing Anomalies | 4reals | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 7 | 09-20-2013 07:16 PM |
Heavily inscribed Ernie Banks Auto'd Ball | mickey7mantle7 | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 10-10-2009 10:13 PM |
One idea, likely heavily flawed, for fixing some of the ills in our hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 01-11-2007 01:44 PM |
too bad this card is so heavily trimmed... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-27-2003 06:03 PM |