 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
02-20-2023, 10:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
For a large pencil mark, more than 2 grades less in price. I cannot understand the logic in how damage from a pen or pencil is not part of the grade. It is after production damage by the end user, like a crease. The PSA system makes no sense at all. A significant mark should allow a card to grade a 3 at absolute best.
For a MC, I would pay over the price of a properly cut card for my T cards, with the rate depending on set and degree of MC. For a Topps card, about the same as a properly cut card unless it’s a 1971 Topps football, in which case the value is unlimited. An OC, a grade or so less. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA grading/pricing question | whiteymet | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-20-2022 12:45 PM |
| CGC Grading Pricing | Stampsfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-22-2020 06:41 PM |
| FYI: New Beckett Card Grading Pricing & Turnaround Times | ngnichols | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-12-2017 08:31 AM |
| A Qualified Peeve | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 12-18-2014 08:43 PM |
| Psa grading and pricing | Toneal13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 11-29-2013 10:51 AM |
Threaded Mode