![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jolly Elm,
Lots of good work, but I’ve been studying those 1969 Topps Rose cards and I think they are two different cards. Several subtle differences, but can’t get past how much more damage the bottom left corner of the PSA 7 ST appears to show in the picture vs. the PSA 7. Also, the bottom border on the PSA 7 ST looks slightly larger than it’s counterpart. More differences within the thin inside white borders of each card, especially in top right corner. With those soft corners, not sure how the ‘ST’ Rose card ever got a PSA 7. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Let me thank you as I eat a huge bowl of crow. The most obvious giveaway is the white halo on Pete's hat on the one card. It was right there in front of me the whole time. Mothers, do not let your children drink and post. PWI is serious. For the life of me I can't figure it out. I assumed it was a crack and resubmit, but when I just dug through my boxes, I located the PSA 7 ST card. It's still here!! Thought I only had one '69 Rose, besides a PSA 9 OC I picked up, but I was wrong. Ugh. Embarrassing. Time to revise the OP. On an odd note, though, it means the PSA Stain Fail Rate is now 75% (3/4), which means only the Bench was 'correctly' graded.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or is it possible that the residue removal wasn't as perfect as hoped and with better scanning/technology, even though we can't really see it with the human eye, their equipment/techniques still detected some lingering residue or other new surface issues now caused by the removal process, with the result being the cards with lowered grades are actually now properly graded, just without the former qualifier?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just have to be willing to wait 4 months to get them back!
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When is a Stain NOT a Frickin' Stain???? | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 17 | 04-20-2023 03:01 PM |
Words fail me. | frohme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-18-2017 10:02 AM |
Big Ebay Fail last night | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 10-30-2015 05:38 PM |
Cubs Fan FAIL | 4reals | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 5 | 06-11-2013 02:01 PM |
Epic fail from SGC | sdkammeyer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-31-2012 11:17 AM |