![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IMO there should be an alternate form of grading that solely and factually represents the condition of the card - is it authentic? altered? creased? marked? off-center(based on physical measurements) etc. Facts only, take the subjectivity out of it. The grade inconsistency in the current system is ridiculous.
If I had a high-dollar card I might want the full PSA-style assessment - for insurance purposes if nothing else. But for the vast majority, I just want to ensure that a card is authentic and unaltered, and that if I cannot see the card in person prior to purchase, I know what physical "deformities" it might have that may or may not be apparent in the scan. And this form of grading could be done at a lower price point/faster turnaround. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this a crazy idea? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 03-01-2017 10:43 AM |
Crazy Idea... | usernamealreadytaken | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 07-03-2011 08:22 PM |
Crazy idea | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 38 | 07-24-2008 07:59 PM |
t206 Wagner (crazy idea) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-24-2008 03:53 PM |
new idea for grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 50 | 12-12-2005 02:00 PM |