Sports Card DAO

[x2drich2000]

So without a central entity in charge, who takes physical possession of the asset? Who is responsible for up keep and handling (i.e. insurance, handling sales, organizing owners wishes, proposing when to sell, etc)? Maybe I'm missing something or just don't understand the relationship between the physical and electronic tracking, but seems like it would be an easy way for someone to just disappear with the items.

[maniac_73]

Originally Posted by x2drich2000

So without a central entity in charge, who takes physical possession of the asset? Who is responsible for up keep and handling (i.e. insurance, handling sales, organizing owners wishes, proposing when to sell, etc)? Maybe I'm missing something or just don't understand the relationship between the physical and electronic tracking, but seems like it would be an easy way for someone to just disappear with the items.

The practice would be to propose and vote on this using the community discord based on the proposals made within the group. Everything is put to a vote and all members vote based on the rules set out in the terms of reference. In theory it’s a complete transparent democracy which is what makes it attractive because the owners have the power.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Fred]

Originally Posted by x2drich2000

So without a central entity in charge, who takes physical possession of the asset? Who is responsible for up keep and handling (i.e. insurance, handling sales, organizing owners wishes, proposing when to sell, etc)? Maybe I'm missing something or just don't understand the relationship between the physical and electronic tracking, but seems like it would be an easy way for someone to just disappear with the items.

I was wondering the same thing.

How does someone "buy in" to this? Does this require the potential investor to have a source of crypto currency to obtain the shares of the card board block chain? How does someone "cash out"? The assumption would be that the payout would be in some type of crypto currency. If, for example, you paid in Bitcoin to enter, would you get paid back in Bitcoin when you decided to sell or would the seller have to accept any crypto currency currently being traded in the crypto market, for example Dogecoin.

If played correctly, the person that starts this anonymous chain could say they own a card (which is physical) and not really own it. Is that a possibility?

Sounds like a possible card board Ponzi scheme.

Please, by all means, educate me on this - I'm an ignorant naysayer that could use a little more understanding of this potential investment vehicle.

[Yoda]

Originally Posted by Fred

I was wondering the same thing.

How does someone "buy in" to this? Does this require the potential investor to have a source of crypto currency to obtain the shares of the card board block chain? How does someone "cash out"? The assumption would be that the payout would be in some type of crypto currency. If, for example, you paid in Bitcoin to enter, would you get paid back in Bitcoin when you decided to sell or would the seller have to accept any crypto currency currently being traded in the crypto market, for example Dogecoin.

If played correctly, the person that starts this anonymous chain could say they own a card (which is physical) and not really own it. Is that a possibility?

Sounds like a possible card board Ponzi scheme.

Please, by all means, educate me on this - I'm an ignorant naysayer that could use a little more understanding of this potential investment vehicle.

Will there be an open marketplace where buyers and sellers can easily buy and sell their fractional shares? It is too complicated for my simple brain, so I will pass.

[brianp-beme]

Originally Posted by Yoda

Will there be an open marketplace where buyers and sellers can easily buy and sell their fractional shares? It is too complicated for my simple brain, so I will pass.

And having the brain I have, I wonder about visitation rights, and whether conjugal visits will be on the table.

Brian

[Fred]

Originally Posted by Yoda

Will there be an open marketplace where buyers and sellers can easily buy and sell their fractional shares? It is too complicated for my simple brain, so I will pass.

John, did you really mean to say:

"An open marketplace where buyers and sellers can easily buy and sell their fractional shares, will there be? Too complicated for my simple brain, it is, So I will pass."

[ajjohnsonsoxfan]

Even though the DAO for the constitution didn't pan out (they publicized their top bid allowing for an easy snipe), I think we'll see many more of these in the future. The blockchain has so much potential for diversified investment (including NFT's where artists can monetize works without middlemen). I haven't participated in any Collectable offerings but they have had a bunch of successful deals. As a collector, I too like to have my preciouses in hand so I can gollum over them but can see a place to have a fractional ownership/investment in certain big historical/expensive pieces.

[D. Bergin]

Originally Posted by ajjohnsonsoxfan

Even though the DAO for the constitution didn't pan out (they publicized their top bid allowing for an easy snipe), I think we'll see many more of these in the future.

LOL, auction houses wish everybody would publicize their top bids. That was basically a $20 million shill bid.

I can't possibly see how this could be taken advantage of.

[maniac_73]

Originally Posted by Fred

I was wondering the same thing.

How does someone "buy in" to this? Does this require the potential investor to have a source of crypto currency to obtain the shares of the card board block chain? How does someone "cash out"? The assumption would be that the payout would be in some type of crypto currency. If, for example, you paid in Bitcoin to enter, would you get paid back in Bitcoin when you decided to sell or would the seller have to accept any crypto currency currently being traded in the crypto market, for example Dogecoin.

If played correctly, the person that starts this anonymous chain could say they own a card (which is physical) and not really own it. Is that a possibility?

Sounds like a possible card board Ponzi scheme.

Please, by all means, educate me on this - I'm an ignorant naysayer that could use a little more understanding of this potential investment vehicle.

Good questions!
With a DAO, you "buy in" with the token thats offered which may be in the form of a coin or even an NFT. This gives you voting power 1 token = 1 vote.

There is no "owner" as everyone who owns tokens are considered owners and every proposal is voted on with the results recorded on the smart contract on the blockchain which are transparent and unalterable. The group decides by vote what to buy and when to sell and how the profits would be paid out to coin holders. The group also decides how to procure and where to store the item through proposals and votes. The idea is that proposals are put forward and they are voted on by all the token holders.

To put it simply, this is the exact model Collectible(the fractional ownership platform) is currently using but instead of the owners of Collectible running the show, this is the cooperative effort of all the participants deciding what to do using the transparency of the blockchain.

Some more info on hows DAO's work
https://consensys.net/blog/blockchai...-do-they-work/

[Vegas Cards]

I know everyone loves PWCC, couldn't you pair this with their vault?

[todeen]

Originally Posted by Vegas Cards

I know everyone loves PWCC, couldn't you pair this with their vault?

This is what I figured. It sounds interesting.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[BobC]

Why does this have to involve a blockchain? You could simply form an LLC and have people put in cash and vote on what they want done and what/when to buy and sell.

Personally, if I own some collectible, I'd want to actually have and hold it in my personal collection, not say to someone I own .000001% of say a T206 Wagner, and then just show them an online image of one I can claim to own a piece of. That isn't collecting, that is investing. And quite frankly, given all the drama and known issues in this hobby, especially the allegations and rumors surrounding many of the dealers, AHs, TPGs, and card doctors/restorers that work in and around it, I'm not so sure this is the proper vehicle to use and rely on for long term investment purposes for most people.

The investment/stock markets are protected by specific laws, and groups like the SEC. Advisors and sellers of typical investment products (stocks, bonds, etc.) generally have to be trained, licensed and are subject to independent oversight. They all have to abide by similar rules and standards that they do not simply decide upon and set themselves. Even the opinions given on a publicly traded company's financial statements can only be rendered by completely independent CPAs/CPA firms, using a single, unique set of established standards that ALL CPAs and CPA firms have to explicitly follow, all CPAs must engage in ongoing professional education every year to maintain their licenses, and also every CPA firm rendering such opinions must allow others from the industry to periodically come in and review their records, systems, and work to ensure they are abiding by the strict rules and standards set for them to render their opinions. Meanwhile, try going and asking a TPG why in their opinion your card only got a 3 instead of a 4 grade, or why one TPG's opinion on a card can be so different from another's. You can't get TPGs to consistently agree to one set of grading standards among themselves, and exactly what training and education do TPG graders even have to go through? And the value of investments, such as stocks, should be based solely on the attributes and financials of the underlying company who's shares are being bought and sold, not also somewhat affected by or even partially dependent upon which CPA firm rendered an opinion on that company's financial statement. So if we are going to be forced to treat cards like investments, shouldn't their value also be based solely on the underlying attributes and condition of the cards, and not affected whatsoever by which TPG graded and rendered an opinion on them? That makes sense to me!

So, it would also seem to me that if we are really going to have our hobby turned into an investment vehicle, whether we like/want it or not, we should start making sure that more appropriate rules, regulations, consistent standards, and oversight of those in and servicing are hobby....errr, investment industry, are being enacted and put in place. Otherwise, we're all just potential marks to be taken advantage of at some point by those that seem to be currently controlling and running our hobby. But honestly, it is probably way too late for the actual collectors/hobbyists to have any hopes of ever reigning in the individuals and companies currently controlling and running things, and simply more interested in lining their pockets. One can always hope though...............

[Leon]

Originally Posted by maniac_73

Good questions!
With a DAO, you "buy in" with the token thats offered which may be in the form of a coin or even an NFT. This gives you voting power 1 token = 1 vote.

There is no "owner" as everyone who owns tokens are considered owners and every proposal is voted on with the results recorded on the smart contract on the blockchain which are transparent and unalterable. The group decides by vote what to buy and when to sell and how the profits would be paid out to coin holders. The group also decides how to procure and where to store the item through proposals and votes. The idea is that proposals are put forward and they are voted on by all the token holders.

To put it simply, this is the exact model Collectible(the fractional ownership platform) is currently using but instead of the owners of Collectible running the show, this is the cooperative effort of all the participants deciding what to do using the transparency of the blockchain.

Some more info on hows DAO's work
https://consensys.net/blog/blockchai...-do-they-work/

It may work for some but this is just not the way I see me going. I value real live things. Have you ever tried to flip a Non Fungible Token?

.

[BobbyStrawberry]

I see some major potential problems, but I'm interested to learn more.

Can you lay out the scenario a bit further that you have in mind? People get together and a create a "basket" of vintage cards, and then what? How would people make money, and why would it be better than operating individually with actual cards?

[BabyRuth]

Just sounds like another modern headache. "I wouldn't touch that with a thirty nine and a half foot pole." - Dr. Seuss

[maniac_73]

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry

I see some major potential problems, but I'm interested to learn more.

Can you lay out the scenario a bit further that you have in mind? People get together and a create a "basket" of vintage cards, and then what? How would people make money, and why would it be better than operating individually with actual cards?

Much like the other fractional platforms, the group would vote on what to buy and when to sell and the profits could either be put into the treasury to buy more cards/memorabilia or distributed as dividends to the groups all based on what is decided by the voting process .


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Fred]

For clarification:

If the price of the asset increases, does the price of the "token" increase with the asset increase?

The assumption is that the "token" can be purchased or sold at anytime and the value of the "token" is set by the voting "token" holders. Is that correct?

How long does it typically take to buy/sell a token? An assumption is that there needs to be a "market" (buyers/sellers) of the "token" in order to transact and if there is nobody willing to purchase the "token", then you're just stuck with it. Is that about right?

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by maniac_73

Much like the other fractional platforms, the group would vote on what to buy and when to sell and the profits could either be put into the treasury to buy more cards/memorabilia or distributed as dividends to the groups all based on what is decided by the voting process .


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

So under that structure, why would I trust my money to the collective (or majority) wisdom of this group? Presumably it would attract people with substantial means but having a lot of money doesn't guarantee anything about being a good card investor.

PS wasn't Evan Mathis involved in some venture like this except with more centralized decisionmaking?

[maniac_73]

Originally Posted by Leon

It may work for some but this is just not the way I see me going. I value real live things. Have you ever tried to flip a Non Fungible Token?

.

I did quite well with nba top shot last year. I knew it was a speculative bubble and sold high before it all crashed


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Leon]

Originally Posted by maniac_73

I did quite well with nba top shot last year. I knew it was a speculative bubble and sold high before it all crashed


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Flipping a card for any money isn't what I was referring to.
Google ..Flipping cards in the early 20th century..

[maniac_73]

Originally Posted by Leon

Flipping a card for any money isn't what I was referring to.
Google ..Flipping cards in the early 20th century..

Oh Haha! I’m 41 I flipped as a kid lol


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Peter_Spaeth]

Out of my league, but DISCORD server seems an ironic name.

Interesting topic, I guess my principal concern would be I don't think having a lot of money always translates into investing wisdom in the card world; from what I've seen guys with a lot of money often just pay what it takes to win and are not very sophisticated or price savvy about it.

[Bestdj777]

I like the idea but have some concerns about the mechanics.

[todeen]

Originally Posted by maniac_73

Good questions!

With a DAO, you "buy in" with the token thats offered which may be in the form of a coin or even an NFT. This gives you voting power 1 token = 1 vote.



There is no "owner" as everyone who owns tokens are considered owners and every proposal is voted on with the results recorded on the smart contract on the blockchain which are transparent and unalterable. The group decides by vote what to buy and when to sell and how the profits would be paid out to coin holders. The group also decides how to procure and where to store the item through proposals and votes. The idea is that proposals are put forward and they are voted on by all the token holders.



To put it simply, this is the exact model Collectible(the fractional ownership platform) is currently using but instead of the owners of Collectible running the show, this is the cooperative effort of all the participants deciding what to do using the transparency of the blockchain.



Some more info on hows DAO's work

https://consensys.net/blog/blockchai...-do-they-work/

The article explanation sounds like a mutual fund. Contracts lay out the rules, I join by giving my money for a share, and I receive voting rights to vote for a manager. There are incentives in a mutual fund to be a part of it. Obviously there are slight differences, but with the contract there are legal ramifications. What lawyer among Net54 members would set up the contract?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

[doug.goodman]

I wish all of you who "invest" a happy new year.

Doug

[Peter_Spaeth]

The US Constitution is for sale??

[Leon]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

The US Constitution is for sale??

For only 43M

https://www.cnn.com/style/article/us...ale/index.html

,

[BobC]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

The US Constitution is for sale??

Aren't pretty much all politicians for sale? So why not the Constitution?