![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe a lot of AH are using photographs now instead of scans, and I assume they're using professional setups. (stands, backgrounds, ideal lenses & settings, etc...) since it is very much in their best interests to portray the card in the best light possible. That is not as true with the stock images I've seen on PSA registry/inventory.
__________________
Bought from: orioles93, JK, Chstrite, lug-nut, Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey, IgnatiusJReilly, jb67, dbfirstman, DeanH3, wrm, Beck6 Sold to: Sean1125, sayitaintso, IgnatiusJReilly, hockeyhockey, mocean, wondo, Casey2296, Belfast1933, Yoda, Peter_Spaeth, hxcmilkshake, kaddyshack, OhioCardCollector, Gorditadogg, Jay Wolt, ClementeFanOh, JollyElm, EddieZ, 4reals, uyu906 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Epson V series, 33,39 and several others, all inexpensive and work great right out of the box, but also allow for several adjustments.
Some AH are using big photograph setups, others use large flat bed scanners. Typically scanners will bring out far more details as to creases/wrinkles, etc where photos tend to mute the issue. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is what my buddy Louis had to say: he has experience with AH submittals, due to his fondness for old cars and the ephemera that accompany them. He also prepares the St. Jude web presence. He says digital photography is okay for one's own personal use, but a scanner set up for cards, with minimal handling, is the only way to go with an AH submittal. His recommendations are Canon (best) and Epson (2nd best).
__________________
James Ingram Successful net54 purchases from/trades with: Tere1071 (twice), Bocabirdman (5 times), 8thEastVB, GoldenAge50s, IronHorse2130, Kris19 (twice), G1911, dacubfan, sflayank, Smanzari, bocca001, eliminator, ejstel, lampertb, rjackson44 (twice), Jason19th, Cmvorce, CobbSpikedMe, Harliduck, donmuth, HercDriver, Huck, theshleps, horzverti, ALBB, lrush |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are so many different settings, both on scanning/photographing and especially on the display end that it's very common for an image to display differently on one device than another.
My scanner will automatically adjust the brightness depending on the image. So If I have say three dark cards and one lighter card I can see a difference when I move the active scanning area from one to the other. (I can select an area that's just bigger than card size, scan, then move that selected area to the next card. I'm not sure other scanners will do that. ) If your monitor setting is bright or dim it will probably make a difference in how you perceive the colors. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
as long as you get a CCD your scans should be good.
I use a epson v370 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Graded Card Scanning Guide - Take a Look! | Ngs428 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 06-25-2021 07:19 PM |
Graded Card Scanning Guide - Take a Look! | Ngs428 | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 18 | 06-25-2021 08:53 AM |
Scanning images for PSA registry... help | Bkrum | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 03-21-2020 04:51 PM |
Show me your grumpy faced baseball card and/or non-card images | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 06-02-2006 10:37 PM |
Will Trade Entire 19th Cent. Collection For Advice / Suggestions Re: Card Scanning | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-24-2006 10:41 AM |