|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cool! This means beyond much doubt that there were at least three separate print runs of this set. My theory is there was an initial run of just cards 1-24 with ‘@1941’. Then there was a subsequent and possibly smaller print run of cards 1-48 also with ‘@ 1941.” And then finally a larger delayed print run of 1-72 without the ‘1941.’
This would be supported by the fact that there are few stars in #25-48 so perhaps the second run was smallest of all and maybe the one most interrupted by war activities. The only thing I don’t like about the theory is that #49-72 would only appear on 1 of 3 print runs so you would think those cards would be more scarce than they seem to be. But perhaps this was a slightly larger run than the first two. Or, maybe they overprinted 49-72 in the final run to help catch those cards up a bit? Either way there had to have been at least 3 print runs. Last edited by Kutcher55; 10-28-2021 at 09:22 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Variation in size on 1940 Playball | snagltooth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-07-2020 10:49 AM |
| 1939 joe dimaggio playball psa 2.5 QUESTION | soxfan1986 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 05-08-2015 08:20 AM |
| PSA Copyright question | smotan_02 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-01-2013 04:22 AM |
| copy/copyright question | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 11 | 05-03-2012 08:29 PM |
| 1941 Playball - Variation - Flaws - Fakes or ??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-05-2006 12:03 AM |