 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
10-27-2021, 09:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks both. That makes sense. My Ted has the 1941 btw. Of the 47 cards I have between 1-48, 25 of them, or 53% have the 1941. If we take that and the research done by Dave H, that would suggest that the 1941 cards are slightly more prolific in the early series. Not enough data to conclude that so it would be nice to hear other people’s set breakdown — at least those like me who were unaware of the variation.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Variation in size on 1940 Playball | snagltooth | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 07-07-2020 09:49 AM |
| 1939 joe dimaggio playball psa 2.5 QUESTION | soxfan1986 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 05-08-2015 07:20 AM |
| PSA Copyright question | smotan_02 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 03-01-2013 03:22 AM |
| copy/copyright question | Ladder7 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 11 | 05-03-2012 07:29 PM |
| 1941 Playball - Variation - Flaws - Fakes or ??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-04-2006 11:03 PM |
Threaded Mode