 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
07-17-2021, 02:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
dead on.
There is certainly an aesthetic appreciation for the cards and the composition of the images. I think the photo/gold leaf combo of the T204 Ramly's are amazing, T205's are much fancier than the T206's (though I like the t206's more), Diamond Stars are the best "Art Nouveau" Card hands down, and I think the 1949 Leaf cards are an amazing nod to contemporary Pop art that was emerging at that time, though I am convinced the guys who were on press were drunk most of the time. 1965 Topps is the embodiment of a baseball card in my book, followed by the 1956 Topps. Everything after 1986 is tough to look at, the dawn of the glossy gold stamped crap.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Good, the Bad and the Ugly | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 14 | 01-02-2018 05:25 PM |
| Mantle Good, Bad, or Just Plain Ugly?? | ruth-gehrig | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 7 | 12-14-2015 08:43 PM |
| Good, Bad or Ugly? | Exhibitman | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 0 | 03-20-2013 12:18 PM |
| FS: M116-The Good, the Bad and the Ugly | sox1903wschamp | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 12-11-2009 12:11 PM |
| good, bad, and ugly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-20-2003 03:12 PM |
Threaded Mode