![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I immediately thought the same thing. But then realized I was comparing it to the traditional standard, as dictated to us by PSA.
I have always believed that the current grading scale foist upon us has way too much room for variance at the low end, yet has miniscule (almost microscopic) variance at the top end. There really is not much visual difference between a 7-8-9-10. But the jump from a 1 to a 4 is practically life changing. Perhaps CSG's grading scale will feature more even increments in condition from number to number. If that's the case, I could easily see the 2.5 grade for the Mays. If their intent is to emulate the PSA/SGC scale, then of course it is over-graded. I personally would prefer a revamped and more evenly spaced grading scale that punishes poor focus or a crease more than a tiny pin hole or speck of paper loss. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1961 Topps high-series 33 card lot and 8 card lot...**lots moved to Ebay** | 1966CUDA | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 11 | 03-11-2020 07:26 PM |
Can Not find a comp for this card anywhere. | EYECOLLECTVINTAGE | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-31-2018 07:27 PM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
raw card grading in ebay listings | keating3620 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-25-2011 07:24 PM |
gma grading / wagner card on ebay | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-19-2007 09:11 PM |