Ugliest PSA 3 ever?

[jchcollins]

Old grade. Would be in the 1.5 range at best today. Regardless, just proof of the fact that PSA has never been terribly consistent.

[campyfan39]

This is why I truly don't understand the obsessing with grading. It is literally someone else's subjective opinion. We have seen so many threads on questionable grades. And now it is very evident the criteria itself has changed. What if it changes again when the current bubble bursts?

Originally Posted by jchcollins

Old grade. Would be in the 1.5 range at best today. Regardless, just proof of the fact that PSA has never been terribly consistent.

[Hxcmilkshake]

Originally Posted by campyfan39

This is why I truly don't understand the obsessing with grading. It is literally someone else's subjective opinion. We have seen so many threads on questionable grades. And now it is very evident the criteria itself has changed. What if it changes again when the current bubble bursts?

Fair.but for those coming into the hobby if nothing else it gives some piece of mind the card is original/unaltered. Helps for resale. Some will not buy a raw card no matter what.

Of course there's exceptions to that too so nothing is 100%

Sent from my SM-G981U using Tapatalk

[ASF123]

Originally Posted by jchcollins

Old grade. Would be in the 1.5 range at best today. Regardless, just proof of the fact that PSA has never been terribly consistent.

Consistently terrible, maybe.

"That's a really sharp suit you got there, Emperor. The color really brings out your eyes."