Is PSA Not Grading T206s with color variations?

[Leon]

Lol

I guess investors want to see a flip.....

Originally Posted by fkm_bky

maybe if it had perforated edges and the hallmarks of an obvious cj fake, psa would grade it for you. :d

i understand the hesitancy to label it as missing color or other descriptives, but at least give it an a, recognizing it's a t206 for crying out loud.

Was going to send the bulk of my collection to psa for grading soon, but i think i'll pass and just hold them as is. Seems there's a lot of turmoil over there right now. I used to be a bigger fan of sgc but i really don't like their new holders.

Bill

[Fred]

I would almost put money on it that PSA will start putting "color variation" on it when they figure out that people will pay a premium for the card. That little bit of text on the flip could be worth another $50 or more on their submission fee if they determine the value of the card is hyper inflated because of the "color variation".

Pretty soon we'll be looking at Pop Reports with this new added tag and then everyone will be able to figure out that the "color variations" must be rare and therefore expensive. damn the voices in my head...

[steve B]

They're "experts" until they get stuff that most kids could spot with 15 minutes training. Then it's "too hard to tell"

How about just close and let actual experts do the work.

[Sean]

I submitted this one to PSA 2 years ago. They told me that they didn't grade "scraps." It's currently in an SGC "A" holder.IMG_1400.jpg

[Sean]

This they graded, but that was 20 years ago. IMG_1341.jpg

[atx840]

Originally Posted by Sean

This they graded, but that was 20 years ago. Attachment 424743

One of my favorite cards Sean

[Sean]

Originally Posted by atx840

One of my favorite cards Sean

Mine as well Chris.