![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
yes but shouldn't they still be able to grade the card as a regular T206 and encapsulate as Authentic?
__________________
Jamie Looking for T206 Errors, Ghosts and Severe Miscuts |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You would think so. That is what SGC did with mine about 3 years ago, graded but no "color variation" label.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey Jamie, they use to put it on the flip but as mentioned I don't think either will anymore unfortunately.
![]() ![]()
__________________
T206 gallery |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You may have to go higher up the chain. Is the front/back combination a recognized combination? Or is it one that could only be a printer's scrap because it was unreleased?
Now that they break out all the different backs/factory numbers, it may not "exist" in the official "set" of pack-released T206 cards. When you submitted, did you comment "SLAB AS AUTHENTIC IF IT DOES NOT GET NUMBER GRADE"?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just checked my scans of these Yellow/Browns that I've put together over the years and all were either raw or SGC graded except for the few that were already posted here in PSA holders. So I've got nothing more to contribute than what already has.
I remember both companies making a change after the first Old Mill Blue was found and graded. When the second was being prepped for grading, that's when a new policy took effect but I don't know the details and that's also why I still haven't graded my Blue Old Mill. It would be nice to have it graded but I don't need either of them to tell me it's real. I already know that. So I've been in a holding pattern for awhile now, when it comes to Third Party Grading.
__________________
Ron - Uncle Nacki T206 Master Monster Front/Back Set Collector - www.youtube.com/unclenacki T206 Basic "The Monster" Set 514/524 T206 Advanced "Master Monster" Front/Back Set ?? ![]() COMPLETE T206 BACK SUBSETS Old Mill Southern Leagues - Black Ink 48/48 Sweet Caporal 350-460 Factory 30 Full Color "No Prints" 28/28 NEAR COMPLETE T206 BACK SUBSETS Polar Bear 245/250 Sovereign 460 50/52 Sweet Caporal 150 Factory 649 Overprint 31/34 Piedmont 350 "Elite 11" 9/11 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For cards such as in OP, all that you need are an AUTH grade.
The card is in rough shape and obviously it's missing colors. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
agreed whats being said here.. and yes i did check the authentic box on the submission form.... seems like a mistake if they thought i needed the flip to say missing color... ill resubmit it and just list the card as a t206 seymour on the submission form with no mention of color missing..
__________________
Jamie Looking for T206 Errors, Ghosts and Severe Miscuts |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Let's see your T206s with color variations... | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 54 | 06-21-2015 05:09 AM |
Looking for T206s with color variations | CMIZ5290 | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 05-30-2015 04:02 PM |
WTB: T206s with color variations | CMIZ5290 | T206 cards B/S/T | 3 | 03-19-2014 05:02 PM |
e93 color variations | esd10 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 06-05-2012 10:50 PM |
e98 color variations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-13-2008 07:51 PM |