 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
09-06-2020, 04:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
They are nothing more than partial backs showing from an incorrectly aligned(or reversed) press run of the backs. There are others with the same anomaly. None of them are part of the set. At my request and explanation, Bob Lemke took them out of the SCD Annual Guide over a decade ago.
See the text below from the 2007 SCD 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T207 back question ? | garymc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-26-2019 06:11 PM |
| T207 back question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-01-2005 08:18 PM |
| T207 Back Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-02-2003 04:43 PM |
| question regarding t205 & t207 back rarity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 04-01-2003 03:52 PM |
| T207 back question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-21-2002 05:38 PM |
Threaded Mode