 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-01-2020, 10:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Saved From My Spokes,
Thanks for your response, but i beg to differ. Firstly, this is a sliver color, not an expert but it seems to be at the opposite spectrum of black. Second, I’ve probably seen over 10,000 Topps 1968 cards in my adulthood and never came across another one from that set....it seems indeed quite rare. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 
|
|
#2
09-02-2020, 09:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Light black print, or any light print from any of the other three primary colors is common.... occurrences of such would not be considered "quite rare". Overall print quality with 68s in regards to color levels, IMO, is better than other years. Not really big into light print anomalies, but here are few "light" and missing print anomalies which I more enjoy. The 68 Schofield card appears to have the same lightness in it's black print as your Pena card. The Ricketts has both missing and low ink. The Marichal has low red ink as does the 80 Hassey card. The 82 Ozzie has low black ink as do many other cards from the 82 set. The 73 FB card is missing an entire color ....
|
|
#3
09-02-2020, 10:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
    
Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-02-2020 at 10:30 AM.
|
|
#4
09-03-2020, 06:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I ran across the 65 Glenn Beckert ink print error on eBay when I looked up 'Topps print flaw' listings, and I noticed that the card below it was also affected. Thanks to the 65 high number sheet scan that Kevvyg1026 posted on another thread I could see that it is Ron Taylor and luckily I found one on eBay. It is recurring because someone else just bought a 65 Beckert ink print error on eBay.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.”
|
|
#5
09-05-2020, 03:48 PM
|
||||
|
||||
.jpg?id=e3bb3546-3d6b-4f75-ad1a-86e48c18c9a0&size=original) 1956 Topps - [Base] #33.2 - Roberto Clemente (White Back) [PSA*3*VG] Courtesy of COMC.com Red splotch on right armpit. Looks like they're pretty common, based on the ones I see on COMC. May not be on the gray back version.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
|
#6
09-05-2020, 05:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geez John. Did not need to know about that
|
|
#7
09-05-2020, 06:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Because of the placement or the expense?
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes.
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1966 Topps High # Print Variations | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 04-27-2014 07:05 PM |
| Are these variations or print defects? | savedfrommyspokes | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-09-2013 12:52 PM |
| Well known print defects. Do variations exist without? | novakjr | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 01-28-2011 05:32 PM |
| Finally confirmed - d311 print variations exist! ("bluegrass" variations) | shammus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 09-03-2010 08:58 PM |
| Wanted: T206 Print Variations and Errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2007 08:23 PM |
Hybrid Mode
