![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have a group question:
Wondering the thought of the board if a card someone considers near mint have gum stains? If not considered near mint - how much does it cost on the grade if card were to be graded? Thanks in advance!
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For me, as a corner junkie, a wax or gum stain does little to me unless it is really dark and on the front. I’d rather have a solid card with wax than a lower condition with no wax.
Given that, I do I understand what goes into determining the technical grade.
__________________
Successful transactions on Net54 with balltrash, greenmonster66; Peter_Spaeth; robw1959; Stetson_1883; boxcar18; Blackie |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
According to PSA's grading standards Mint 9 allows for "a very slight wax stain on reverse". But as we all know, who really knows what any PSA grading team will actually agree on.
__________________
BZT |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gum or wax? Wax absolutely can especially of a bowman, gum Stain no way.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No stains allowed on a near mint card (if I'm buying it). How much of a hit is going to be card specific based on a total of all condition factors.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have this mint 1974 Billy Williams with the obligatory gum stains on back (which looks darker in the scan than in reality)...
1974williams110psa9st.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Was going to say I've had '51 Bowmans with the typical light wax stains get 7's
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would say that with disclosure that there is a stain, yes. But if you just list the card condition as Near Mint and do not disclose a wax stain, you set yourself up for a return.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Those don't count. They're printed on.... ;-)
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Have no experience with gum stains. I know SGC will only give you a 60/5 EX on cards with wax stains. A few years ago I had them grade a complete set and the wax stained cars all got the same grade. Without the stains they would have gotten 7s and 8s like the rest of the set.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting question. My answer is yes,depending on severity. I don't think the opinionators feel that way though.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
51 Bowman -Wax stains or Gum stains? | pawpawdiv9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-04-2015 10:06 PM |
Wanted PSA/BVG 1 or PSA/BVG 2 1909 T206 Magie Error card (with no stains) | Zone91 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 04-23-2013 07:53 AM |
Foxing / Dirt Stains on card Fronts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-30-2009 12:15 PM |
Need a quick answer on this one - ref. stains on a card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-20-2009 07:45 PM |
anyone had any luck getting stains off a card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-28-2007 05:30 AM |