 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
05-11-2020, 03:37 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I would say that with disclosure that there is a stain, yes. But if you just list the card condition as Near Mint and do not disclose a wax stain, you set yourself up for a return.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 51 Bowman -Wax stains or Gum stains? | pawpawdiv9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-04-2015 10:06 PM |
| Wanted PSA/BVG 1 or PSA/BVG 2 1909 T206 Magie Error card (with no stains) | Zone91 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 04-23-2013 07:53 AM |
| Foxing / Dirt Stains on card Fronts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-30-2009 12:15 PM |
| Need a quick answer on this one - ref. stains on a card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-20-2009 07:45 PM |
| anyone had any luck getting stains off a card? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-28-2007 05:30 AM |
Threaded Mode