![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks for the replies, guys. There are two "no ." versions on COMC (both Dean's) and both can really be blown up, with both having a faint "." visible. My example might be a tad more, below are my three versions of the card with the backs together to compare. The green wash on the "no circle, no ." one of mine might have also lead me to wonder about shenanigans...
Al - I'm in a similar boat, going for Topps team sets of the Red Sox with the variations. Something like this one honestly doesn't do much for me since, as you note, it's just a recurring print defect. But I've got one now. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1959 Topps -- New Variation? | JUrsaner | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 24 | 11-19-2019 12:13 PM |
Question about color variation on 1955 Topps Roberto Clemente | luciobar1980 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 05-25-2019 02:37 PM |
1959 Topps Dolan Nichols Variation Pair | Wite3 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-08-2014 03:35 PM |
1959 Topps Dodgers Team variation | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 11 | 01-24-2014 02:08 PM |
FS-Redsox 1978 Letter From Haywood Sullivan | daves_resale_shop | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 2 | 11-30-2013 11:44 PM |