Graded card advice - 56 Williams

[IgnatiusJReilly]

Here’s the pic from eBay



Here’s my scan



I don’t think his pic captured the print line that well or the purple print marks on the right border. Perhaps I’m being hyperbolic, so it would be good to get some other opinions.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Steve D]

I agree with you, and would definitely send it back.

Ebay allows you to send it back, regardless of the seller stating differently.

I would argue that this qualifies as a SNAD (significantly not as described), as it appears the seller doctored the photo to remove indications of the print line and lighten the ink dots in the right border. He also makes no mention of them in the description.

Steve

[swarmee]

Looks like his neck is going into a clothesline in the batting image. Image definitely oversaturated. Could be scanner settings, could be unintentional, or could be intentional. But yes, I'd send it back.

[JollyElm]

There is no way, none, that the results of the seller's scan are unintentional. It takes 5 seconds in photoshop to imitate what he did. Send it back.

[bobbyw8469]

That doesn't even look like the same card. The purple marks are missing as well as the print line going across the front. He got a premium price based on a premium scan. Obviously, in hand, you see the card is FAR from being a premium card, and should probably not even get VCP average. I would be disappointed too.