![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm not trying to argue here, but why would a card that may have been printed on a poster (and not many times apparently since this is the only one seen so far) that may not even have been printed to be a part of the actual set have to fit in a cigarette pack to be a period piece? It's only 1/8" long for crying out loud. That's nothing. And if it was just printed on a advertising sheet is it that out the realm of possibility that it might not be the actual size considering a lot of advertising show product larger than actual size? I just don't get this argument. I don't get many of them to be honest, but just wanted to comment on this particular one right now.
![]()
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Andy -
In short, because the known poster cuts are generally the same size as the regular cards. Are they all 100% exact? Nope. Out of curiosity, I just pulled out my poster card and a regular card, and the poster card is about 1/16" of an inch larger. Both are entirely legitimate cards. They are generally about the same size but ever so slightly different. That, of course, is very common. 1/16" is a minute amount in pre-war card standards. Could a different card be an additional 1/16" off? To me, quite easily. Especially when you consider the variances in even pack-issued cards. T206s, for example, easily vary by that much -- sometimes more than that.
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (16/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50) N184 Kimball Champions (37/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The size argument pertains to the card the OP posted not a hypothetical other card from a hypothetical other sheet. Look at the OP card the borders are pretty tight. If the borders were larger than normal top to bottom I agree the 1/8 inch might be a possibility.
And two two seperate guesses were put forth one that it was a proof card. That is where the card size and the pack size argument came in. I said why would Buchner spend the money to produce a proof card that would not fit in a pack. The second guess was that this is a card cut from a sheet. Again to my knowledge no other card cut from a known sheet varies this much. Could a card be cut from a sheet have some extra border sure but if it was cut from a known ad sheet I think it would pick up some extra color on the top or bottom if it was an extra 1/8 inch. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
wtb n284 buchner gold coin | esd10 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-09-2012 11:36 AM |
N284 Buchner Gold Coin | SmokyBurgess | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 5 | 11-06-2009 07:21 AM |
N284 Buchner Gold Coin SGC-40 | Jay Wolt | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-10-2009 02:30 PM |
Help w/ N284 (Buchner Gold Coin) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-11-2004 03:17 PM |
Question about Buchner Gold Coin N284 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-27-2002 10:13 AM |