![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wouldn't re-grade mean they had done some actual grading in the past?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BUT if you ask for a review, I believe they will reholder
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I’ve seen scenarios where they “reviewed” without actually removing the card from holder. Case by case scenario I guess. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not a rumor at all. They done it with that DiMaggio that was altered and sold through PWCC. Big thread on here about how Brent bought it then it magically looked way better when he sold it.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
All reviews and crossovers are done while the card is in the holder. If it meets the minimum grade requested, it gets cracked out and put in a new holder with new flip. It during the reholder they detect trimming, then they contact the card owner to figure out how to handle it. If it doesn't meet min grade but you want it reholdered anyways, you can request it on the submission form, but they are not obligated to do it.
Mechanical errors are not reviews, and PSA fixes them for free.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll try to make this as short as possible.
I purchased a card that was described as "having dust in the flip." I contacted the seller and told him I would be sending it in to be reholdered and if there was any funny business I would be returning the card. Seller said no problem. I sent the card in on a reholder submission. PSA came back at me and said water had gotten in the slab, what did they want me to do? I explained the situation and said I'd just want it back so I could return it. They came back and said the slab had been tampered with and they could not return it as-is. It was no longer a PSA 10 and they wouldn't allow their brand to be shown in such a manner. We agreed that it would stay in its original slab but they would deface it. They drilled a hole through the flip portion of the slab and carved an 'X' in the card portion of it. Of course, the seller refused the return and I had to go through Paypal. PSA was very helpful and wrote out a letter on their stationary explaining the situation and I got my refund. It's my understanding that damage to a slab outside of the card area will get an easy reholder. Damage to the card portion of the slab will get a review and POSSIBLY a regrade if deemed necessary. From what I understand, regrades are rare. Arthur
__________________
"A lot of those guys don't seem to be having as much fun as they should be." Successful transactions with Burger King, Amazon, Great Cuts, Tacos Villa Corona, TJ Maxx |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That has to be the line of the century from PSA. So alterations, trimming, coloring, etc is ok and they have no problem allowing their brand to be shown in such a manner, but a little agua hits the slab and they bring out the drill to take it out of circulation. This is some hobby.
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When you see prices like this do you automatically assume shenanigans? | Aquarian Sports Cards | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-21-2018 06:24 AM |
Chance of Regrade? | dio | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 10 | 06-14-2018 11:49 AM |
Should I regrade this Clemente RC? | kemdawg | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 12-21-2016 11:58 AM |
25% shipped out for regrade... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-14-2006 11:28 PM |
Regrade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-26-2005 11:51 AM |