 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
07-05-2019, 06:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Soaking of any post-war card is probably against the general consensus, because the composition of the cardboard differs. Soaking a pre-war card in distilled water does not damage the card, done properly. Soaking a post-war card probably does, especially with chemical solvents. And yes, this card appears to have the toning removed (a la the WWG DiMaggio).
Dpeck, just because some random guys on a message board say that "soaking is okay" doesn't make all soaking okay. Especially when PSA has N-7 and SGC has Cleaned as reasons they don't give number grades to cards that have been soaked with bleach. Quote:
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Potentially fake D350-3 Standard Biscuit backed cards on eBay | rhettyeakley | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 01-01-2024 07:24 PM |
| Fake Signed T206 Cards (Too Many to List in the Title, See First Post for List) | SetBuilder | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1061 | 09-04-2020 06:44 PM |
| Am I Potentially Getting Scammed? Paypal | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 03-20-2018 05:39 PM |
| How it feels to FINALLY cross your most-wanted card off your list..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-29-2007 11:15 AM |
| Potentially Dumb JSA/SGC Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-15-2006 06:42 AM |
Threaded Mode