 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37
05-22-2019, 11:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
The market has judged via its’ valuations that PSA has a superior product. If PSA refused to cross SGC’s cards (and there is no blanket policy, some cards do cross)they would not be diminishing their value, the marketplace has already done that. For all the cards that PSA refuses to cross to an equivalent grade they are doing nothing to the card’s value. For the cards they do cross they are increasing their value and indirectly the value of the SGC brand.
However, there is no reason for PSA to worry about SGC. Look at the lines in front of each company’s booths at the National and judge for yourself whether this battle isn’t already over. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need advice on crossover / re-grading | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-18-2017 06:43 PM |
| Starx Cards - Grading - Crossover? | toledo_mudhen | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 07-04-2014 03:39 AM |
| T201...To crossover or not crossover | drmondobueno | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-19-2012 10:14 AM |
| Sgc crossover | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-27-2008 07:39 AM |
| Crossover value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-04-2004 08:49 AM |
Threaded Mode