 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20
05-22-2019, 03:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
My guess is that crossover submissions represent a minuscule portion of PSA total submissions. It seems that the easiest way to address the issue is to raise the fee for such service to a minimum of $100, with the fee increasing as the value of the card increases.That would effectively put an end to crossover business, ending the arb of people trying to buy lower priced SGC cards and, without cracking them out, get them into comparable PSA holders.
Last edited by oldjudge; 05-22-2019 at 03:51 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need advice on crossover / re-grading | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-18-2017 06:43 PM |
| Starx Cards - Grading - Crossover? | toledo_mudhen | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 07-04-2014 03:39 AM |
| T201...To crossover or not crossover | drmondobueno | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-19-2012 10:14 AM |
| Sgc crossover | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-27-2008 07:39 AM |
| Crossover value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-04-2004 08:49 AM |
Threaded Mode