![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
MK is not one they usually remove. So if PSA thinks it's an Excellent card otherwise, it would still most likely get a 5(MK) despite requesting "no qualifiers". They reserve the right to leave the qualifier on there. Normally NQ is used for things like OC or ST. A 5(MK) would count like a PSA 3 in their registry competition.
If you really don't want to get the MK qualifier, you might need to call PSA. But I've received cards back graded PSA 1(MK) before. And I've also had multiple cards with marks not get graded as MK, probably because the grader missed it somehow. The two cards I'm thinking about were fairly obvious to spot the writing or additional ink. Quote:
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How much does a Qualifier affect the Value of a higher grade card? | Blunder19 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-12-2017 06:15 PM |
Why not a higher grade with a qualifier for tape on back? | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-26-2012 04:52 PM |
Will this card grade marked, stained or both? | Northviewcats | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-16-2011 03:15 PM |
WTB: Low to mid-grade T206 w/qualifier | freakhappy | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-13-2011 11:43 PM |
PSA OC for Lower Grade without Qualifier? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 08-02-2008 10:06 AM |