 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
01-11-2019, 05:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I don't see an answer on PSA's page or their message board.
My guess is if the flaw is difficult to see with the naked eye (like small stains or marks), they would go with that since the off-centeredness is easy to determine through the slab. If they're both visible/noticeable, then probably the worst one. You'd have to send them an email and find out in 6-8 weeks.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What's Worse? | slidekellyslide | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 11 | 07-24-2013 08:41 PM |
| Who decides value? Is Beckett the only? | Fred McGriff | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 6 | 10-24-2012 07:03 AM |
| Can a card get worse than this one? | olrac44 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-14-2012 10:30 AM |
| New board- for better or worse | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 05-18-2009 02:37 PM |
| Who is worse? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 07-30-2006 06:19 PM |
Threaded Mode