![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Do any of you guys know of a binder big enough to hold a 1970s set in 9 pocket pages? I like the Archival Methods binders, but I don't think they are quite big enough.
Last edited by vintagebaseballcardguy; 12-12-2018 at 01:34 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All of my 1970s sets are in "Ultra Pro" binders. They seem to hold them well.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a regular 3". Approximately 800 cards seems to be the cut off where it get too full. My 1980s sets that are 792 and then 132 Traded go into "BCW" binders which are technically 3" but seem to have a little more room.
Last edited by sfh24; 12-12-2018 at 05:11 PM. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
One quick note, though. If you use Ultra Pro binders try and use the newer version. The difference is in the D clip. On the older versions the break between the two arms occurs AFTER the curve starts. This causes some of the pages in front to creep up and curl. You could damage some of the cards on the first couple pages that way. The newer folders have the prong that the pages fit onto going straight up and catching there. It holds them much better. I've had to upgrade all of my binders because of this. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have posted in this thread a few times. Thanks to the threads on the 1970 and 1972 Topps sets, I am specifically thinking on the early 70s sets. Early on, I was advocating the purchase of complete sets and then upgrading where needed. Honestly, I wrestle with this a lot, and I can see from this thread many of you do, too. I am a budget collector and can't necessarily just jump out there and buy a complete set. Sometimes I can, but regularly, no when talking about early 1970s and on back into the 1960s.
I know that I will spend more on each set in the long run, but I will just have to be content with a few cards at a time or some larger lots minus some of the stars. Compared to some of the 50s and 60s cards and sets I have bought, the 70s material is much more affordable. So, I won't be spending as much as I go anyway. It's all for the fun of seeing those pages in the binder fill in over time anyway. I am mulling over which 70s set I might try first, and I am kind of leaning toward '71. I am just not sure if I can control my OCD with those black colored corners and edges! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TONS of POST Cereal FS- Any Set Builders/Want to be Set Builders? | BanksFanForever | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 21 | 07-03-2018 07:36 PM |
What is the most effective way to photograph a baseball? | Jerry G | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 3 | 08-01-2016 02:26 AM |
Mintacular's Vintage BST for set builders, etc. CHEAP cards updated 5/21 | mintacular | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 05-21-2016 03:08 PM |
Effective Buyer's Premium - A New Term | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 05-22-2014 06:36 AM |
Ebay Fee Changes Effective Tomorrow | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-16-2008 08:23 PM |