![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Is your T205 Matty raw or graded? | |||
Raw |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 29.63% |
Graded |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
57 | 70.37% |
Voters: 81. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I collected the set and all the T205s are in a binder. The Matty is EX.
Last edited by tbob; 09-26-2018 at 09:48 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My continuing partial set is a mix of raw and graded as I plod along. The Matty is graded. I have to think that higher end HOF'ers have a higher percentage of them being graded too. So another question might be more broad and only ask how many T205s are graded vs ungraded? And I think the original hypothesis that there are more folks doing the T205 set than some more obscure ones, set builders like binders and binders are more conducive to raw cards. Therefore, there might be a higher percentage of raw T205s than others, is accurate too. I guess there are approx. 6-12%, known T205s which are graded. Of known Matty's I think you could triple that number. Those are wild guesses because who really knows?
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 09-29-2018 at 03:28 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’ve got 3 higher ones graded and a lower (fair) Piedmont 42 ungraded.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137748538@N02/albums Successful transactions with Sycks22, Vintageloz, jim, zachclose21, shamus, Chris Counts, YankeeFan Snapolit1 and many more. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The poll has been running for a week, it sounds like a good time to try to draw some conclusions.
Including those mentioned in the thread, 66% of the T205 Mattys represented here are graded. There were a total of 80 cards reported. rats60 is thinking that inactive collectors (who aren't reading net54) are less likely to have graded cards. So maybe 66% is an over-estimation. On the other hand, for sets that are less set-builder-friendly, you'd expect a higher percentage to be graded. (The hazard of doing a poll on a card from a non-set-builder-friendly set is that the sample reported wouldn't be big enough to generalize from.) So we have two considerations that are external to the poll, which would push the results in opposite directions. So even if the over all percentage of pre-war cards that are graded is very small (and it must be), it seems that the percentage of significant pre-war cards that are graded is pretty healthy. Maybe even >50%, if the population of non-active collectors isn't too big. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think there are a LOT of collectors who don't do grading and don't do internet (forums.) That number is shrinking daily though.
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Percentage of Net Worth | SMPEP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 48 | 05-13-2020 08:11 AM |
What Percentage of Vintage Cards Have Been Graded? | OldOriole | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 10-28-2017 12:44 AM |
What Percentage of the 18,000+ MLB Players are represented in Your Collection? | clydepepper | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-07-2014 07:18 AM |
What percentage of your net worth? | Cardboard Junkie | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 15 | 07-04-2014 07:37 AM |
Sniping win percentage - What is yours? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-02-2008 07:05 PM |