Need Grading Opinion On 1933 Goudey Ruth

[glchen]

4.5. I'm going to guess this was due to a small round sticker on the card, and what we are seeing was an indent due to a fingernail removing the sticker, and some slight paper loss when the sticker was removed.

[btcarfagno]

Originally Posted by glchen

4.5. I'm going to guess this was due to a small round sticker on the card, and what we are seeing was an indent due to a fingernail removing the sticker, and some slight paper loss when the sticker was removed.

That would make a lot of sense given the nature of where it came from. What do you think it would grade without that issue? In other words, what kind of hit did the card take as a result of it?

[swarmee]

I would expect a 4.5 to 5.5 if I submitted it. If the grader thinks there is paper loss, it could be worse. I have a PSA 4 Mantle with a black smudge in the corner that was not given a qualifier.
Because of the front centering and the "notch" on the top border on the back, maybe a straight 6 would be the highest without the surface flaw you're talking about.

[glchen]

Is that a small crease on the right edge near the top? If that's not a crease, I think the card would have gotten a 6 without the surface issues.

[btcarfagno]

No that is not a crease.

Hopefully if it does grade somewhere in the 4 or 4.5 neighborhood it will sell for more because of the eye appeal. Maybe?

[chalupacollects]

I don't know rest of card isn't bad, corners are good, color is good and stock is bright, maybe a bleed of green on the back could ber a 5-5.5 as is.. IMO

[swarmee]

If the grader at PSA deems it to be an erasure, it could get a 5(MK) or possibly even just AUTHENTIC ALTERED.