![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I like the old flips better. Maybe this style will grow on me.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not a fan of the new label, who’s idea was it to change ?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I appreciate that after 20 years they’ve figured out how to produce a label without perforated edges.
I’m curious about the 9.5 grade. Will 9.5 equal the old SGC 98/10 grade? Or is the new 9.5 somewhere between the old SGC 96 and 98? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like it! Their label was in desperate need of updating. As martuzzi stated the perforated edges on their old labels looked horrible at times. I think this change was a long time coming.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
...I'm still aggravated that they moved the damned barcode in 1999.... ... |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|