![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’m not sure why something about the label or case struck me as odd, and I can’t put my finger on it. I could be crazy though:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/282891951947?ul_noapp=true Last edited by Leon; 03-31-2018 at 08:17 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The scan is really terrible, so maybe that's it? The color of everything looks off. The card looks okay to me though.
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks bad to me.
Appears to be frosting on the whole left side. The bottom left looks tampered with, see scratch/crack As for the card....looks not to be graded a 4...the corners look to roughed-up.
__________________
1916-20 UNC Big Heads Need: Ping Bodie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I`m with Chris on this one for all the above reasons, i`d look elsewhere.
__________________
H Murphy Collection https://www.flickr.com/photos/154296763@N05/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not the best scan but with the return policy I think you should be fine. If you like it i would go for it and you could always return it if not satisfied.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
May be the case, the card doesn't scream fake to me, and it seems like an awful lot of work/risk to swap a PSA 4 card out for what I'm assuming you think should be a 2. I just don't see a huge incentive to make the risk worthwhile...
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree it is so not worth the effort for anyone to spend their time trying to scam that, but those top corners are wickedly ugly. I just glanced through half dozen other fours on the web and the difference is night/day for just sometimes $20 more. My guess is you would regret that card. Cards at that grade level are not scarce. In this situation patience is your friend (and I know b/c I've fought that advice enough myself to have more regrets than I would prefer)
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whether there's tomfoolery involved or the card was graded earlier on when PSA was (possibly?) less stringent with their grading parameters, I think you would be hard pressed to find someone who believes that if it was graded today, the Clemente would still receive a 4. Like Empty said, I would be patient until a better one comes along.
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I agree. This is my newer graded 56, and imo, it looks much nicer than the 4 shown.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Looks Suspicious; '70 Aaron | Beastmode | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 05-19-2016 05:56 AM |
Suspicious? | atx840 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 33 | 05-20-2015 05:26 PM |
I get suspicious when... | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 09-10-2011 09:54 PM |
Suspicious ....?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 07-30-2004 09:21 AM |
Hmmm...suspicious | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-15-2002 08:30 PM |