![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe he means he that he had to get up “early” to stamp the photos himself.
![]()
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 03-03-2018 at 07:23 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't like them for being real photo. Too grainy and too black and white.
Here is a real photo postcard which was tinted and I thought kind of cool.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 03-03-2018 at 07:45 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Their overall appearance doesn't look at all consistent with the time period indicated. The fact that the erasures performed were so heavy as to remove the text present is a major red flag.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe I'm overthinking this, but the first thing that came to mind is that they are clearly not postcards.
Last edited by Snapolit1; 03-03-2018 at 03:02 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And the erasures are on the same spot on both cards. Like where a modern era zip code may have been. What an usual coincidence!
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am a long ways from an expert but I have a few photo postcards from the same time period. My thought was that a photo postcard was meant to be sent thus would have a place for a stamp/address. I may be mistaken. This is one I have from the same time period
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the replies thus far.
Jim, the ones I have, the photos themselves do look consistent with yours, though mine have a name printed on them. I can still return these, but I'd just as soon keep them if they're real. I've looked at them under a pocket microscope, and they are real photos, not prints. For those of you interested in real photos, Here are links I found on Google: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real_photo_postcard https://www.collectorsweekly.com/postcards/real-photo http://www.metropostcard.com/guiderealphoto.html http://www.postcardvalues.com/realphotopostcards.html Any other expertise about RPPC's in general, or in particular as to whether or not these are real, would be appreciated. Let me add that there are two lines erased under the Photo Postcard stamp. The first line says: S ... [Sports?] Cards B ? Collectors The second line ends in a number--[I can discern ... 62 on three of them]--could be a zip code at the end of an address. Here are the other two cards: https://www.ebay.com/itm/1929-Dale-B...vip=true&rt=nc https://www.ebay.com/itm/1929-MAX-CA...vip=true&rt=nc Last edited by dougscats; 03-12-2018 at 03:23 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
five-digit zipcodes didn't start until 1963.
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) Last edited by h2oya311; 03-12-2018 at 10:21 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1950's Yankee Stadium RPPC, 1945 Maple Leaf Gardens RPPC, Cincinnati Reds Photo | jb217676 | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 8 | 07-16-2017 09:10 AM |
RPPC Postcard Help, please! | Eggoman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-28-2017 08:12 AM |
Rppc | bigfish | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-23-2010 08:03 PM |
RPPC player ID help | dbrown | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-17-2010 09:38 PM |
Say It Ain't So - RPPC | Matt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-01-2009 01:02 PM |